Tuesday, 23 May 2017

Healthy brain function

Green Med Info offers depth of information but also magazine trivia - this page on 7 ways to keep your brain young prompted an extra 'tidbit' of possibly useful information - along with comment on the foundations of health - which cannot be apart from life or being as a mere system of mechanical relations however subtle and complex those relations.
- - -



As a piecemeal factoid snippet, Vit K2 (mk7) is found to remove calcium from soft tissue deposits - arteries and brain included - and move it to where it belongs. So not being deficient in K2 may be a significant factor.
- - -
meta-commentary:
Synergies of effects can operate positively or negatively - and simply adding 'good' things wont in itself set a good foundation. A true foundation is where we live FROM.

if we are seeking 'health' as an evasion of fearful consequence - then we bring those fears with us in the very acts that seem positive. The call to wholeness is the call to joy and health is not an evasion or absence of symptoms - but rather a freedom from being negatively defined by conflicted self OR its symptoms. Focussing in what we don't want - as if a positive act is the nature of 'mind-capture'.

And focusing exclusively in the physically framed sense of life, deprives even our physical brain of its wholeness-as part-of a greater communication and sharing in Life. And so seem to be a brain, enclosed in a body, condemned in time to suffer and die and so understandably dissociating from such 'reality' in seeking to set a narrative over it.

In its chronic or persistent activation, fear operates 'mind-capture' by its fight/flight response. All else is suppressed by the sympathetic nervous response - but the balancing and restoring of a greater embrace works to protect even amidst such stress. Chronic fear works against this embrace or rebalancing, and blocks healing - so as to make stress a negative addiction rather than a positive catalyst to the need of a greater embrace.

In life a flexible mind can serve a relational integrity - where a rigidity breaks down and separates off. This fact has reflections in our biology.


Saturday, 20 May 2017

Chemtrails blocking the light

Below is my comment into one commentary video among many upon the geo-engineering operating for decades now, without public accountability or oversight and for reasons undisclosed.

In reply to H. Vlad - who said:
This is the way of choosing. Thru out history there was a series of
puzzles that demanded attention because of results that changed (in
worst, most cases) the perception of reality, of life as we see it. We
as participants in this all around show that we call life, are
challenged to take a stance and make a CHOICE, utterly based, in
principle, to our convictions, our desires.

Yes - that's where I feel to be with regard to perceiving an 'insane' world. Step back and feel what the real choice is - rather than be conformed in false framing. If I write now on the theme of this - it is to (your) willingness to alight in it - and not as a personal response or expectation.

Giving power to hate, fear and death, is subjection and torment of such experience. The mind cannot think outside its conditioning but from a new choice, rises a new mind. The choice to hate and fear a negative... becomes the negative operating in mask or disguise. The choice to not align in, support or give focus of energy and attention in reaction is a 'releasing the mind' in which the true movement of an Original Nature aligns a choice I cannot make alone - for the 'alone-ness' IS the mind of the choice to give power to a wish - and believe it guilty of killing true - which in a sense it does while operating as the foundation of the mind.

The 'survival' (fear and war) script becomes an awakening script. Firstly to the exposure of the insanity as insane. A choice to hate and resist evil - unrecognized as choice - locks the mind into forcing its version of 'sanity' on top of perceived chaos under the guilt of fear - and the fear of guilt's penalty. From the point of the Projection called the Fall - this is where we 'came in' or were 'entranced' and so this is where NOT justifying re-investment in hate as word, thought and deed - puts the 'mind behind'. (releases a trapped or looped attention). And opens to all things new. This cannot be put into old paradigm concept without subverting the forms of new insight to the same old deceit.

This opening or disclosure may be imagined or surmised to occur in any case with physical death - but opening a House of Many Mansions while yet in the focus of physical sense is a collective shift - in a choiceless choice - for when the nature of what SEEMS choice is starkly illuminated, no 'mind' of 'choose-between' sits on its illusory fence. But the nature of the 'mind' of 'choose-between' is to know not what it does. Or in modern terms - unconscious of the nature and habit of its choices - in a world that seems to just 'happen' and to which reaction is already preloaded to be triggered.

To love in hell is a self-contradiction - just as is 'war in Heaven'. To be the willingness of love in hell is any instant of the release of the mind of self-hatred to the simple and native desire for truth.

If God so loved his Son that He gave him the world healed and anew - then to shift to the point of recognition of such calls for an alignment in like qualities - as the choices by which we accept a true Source and Authoring rather than assert an oppositional independence that only seems power by the hidden hate of a false self seeking.

The psyop of fear is at root the call to fear in denial. It calls for allegiance in sacrifice of wholeness to a reversal f Creation - under the guise of power and protection for a fragmented and dissociated sense of self.

The idea that humans do only what is in their own interest needs also to allow their accepted self-definition frames their perceptions and reactions. Self-hate is more than capable of operating a vengeance upon all that lives under an illusion of being a power above a hated life. For it supports not our self-specialness in 'wish' no matter how forcefully or how pathetically we play that out - and so a sense of betrayal is projected by the wish that is actually embodied in the choice of a wish over true willing. Knowing not what we do.

To raise the illusion of power, one must kill the truth and keep it so. But to the belief in such power does love seem total sacrifice - because the true power of life is not felt within such belief - being already the doing of the thing it fears.

This is a morning meditation. The sun here where I write is bright and today is at hand to be lived - one way or another. The feeling of being and the recognition of love's honesty is not demanding special forms and conditions to be itself, but rather a willingness of 'not knowing' into which the prompts and inspirations of the ordinary moment - become the felt movement of a flow of being. And yes - this will encounter 'unwillingness' or 'resistance' that can frame me in reaction or be released in discernment.

Why do I have a mind that can block the light - and cast all in its own shadow? When its victory is my defeat also?
Because I give it attention and allegiance and prominence in place of a true appreciation.
How might we wake to the nature and the act of what we do - beneath the mask of the world, but by meeting our Reflection at every turn? Are we damned thereby? Or released while the cock crows dawning by the grace of noticing.

If there seems a harvest of fear, is there also not a harvest of willingness for love? - through which love's recognition wordlessly extends - unblocked and truly alive?

The archetype of sacrifice to the god of terror

Comment into:

Scientific Safety of Vaccine Safety Research


In mythic terms, the people are coerced and compelled to sacrifice their vitality (their young) to the 'god' or 'terror' upon whose appeasement our 'protection' depends.
This story - and variations of it - are a deep archetype upon which the perceived world operates.

For we are coerced and compelled by 'conditions and conditioning' to sacrifice a natural feeling wholeness of being, for a mask of protection by which to participate , adapt and survive the human experience. The terrors or trauma of conflict that the masking covers are both the fear and the hatred of the fear, that demand a sense of power over life - where life itself is feared and assigned the projection of our own conflicting intent.

The division of mind to define, predict and control is itself ruling out wholeness - and seeking to interject a censor or control upon the flow of information - or the meeting of true need.
A tyrannous mind is a tyrannized mind that knows not what it does - and justifies itself in hate and fear of its own unrecognised reflection. It accuses those who do choose not to assault and sicken children of 'killing children' while doing exactly the thing they say they hate, under the banner of righteous necessity - that brooks no chink of light for revision, discussion, investigation or debate - and so takes on the qualities of an 'evil' mandate behind a mask. This triggers a polarisation of defiance against an un-owned hate. For to pharmaceutically assault babies and children (and adults) under the guise of a theory asserted as medical fact - as if the 'science is settled' - is State or indeed corporately owned state power.

Clinging to a dying model or image of self and world-reality is calling suffering and death by wilful ignorance. The attempt to control leads to a more and more out of control 'reality-experience' of narrative framing - pumping up the pharma, military-industrial and 'intelligence' structure like a cancerous tumour - sucking all the vitality from the whole to the priesthoods of 'control'.

While 'they' have our allegiance and support - as power and protection of our sense of self in life - they USE it to lose the patient while 'killing' the disease.

Pre-emptive attack is becoming the normal. The array of 'power and protection' against what is imagined, feared or subliminally programmed to happen.

I cant engage in reasoned discussion with the intent to only adopt the FORM of communication as  weapon against it. That mind is closed by design. But where any willingness arises - let it find a willingness in me to join with.

The 'evil' is set up to be un-challengable in direct terms - for it is foundational to the way we have learned/been trained to think - in place of a qualitatively transcendent nature that has been denied a structural voice. This is the work of an active willingness for wholeness of being - health and sanity - regardless the forms it takes.

Using the form of things to mask hidden intent is what we take to be a private mind. Identifying behind a 'fig-leafed' obfuscation pays the price, while clever accounting 'outsources' and redefines so as to displace pain and loss to 'other' or not self.

No one is blinded by science - but the wish NOT to see finds a match in forms of scientism. There is nothing about ANY human endeavour that is not ruled by the same - generally unconscious - archetypes.

Love of truth cannot abandon Reason and Science - but only release the confusion of masking forms to a renewal of a love of truth and the truth of love - which has NO place in the mind of wilful conflict and confusion.

If there is a first-born to give up in favour of a true foundation - it is our private separative and unloving thoughts - by which we rule out love in a sense of limited sacrifice as the mind of 'what do I get out of this?'

Well you get a sense of disconnection under an illusion of power that draws ever more of you to forget what Connection is and defend against it to protect a false investment.

If this is 'too long' I would post a thumbnail and link to the rest. But it arose in context of relationship at this timing - in this opening of communication - and so comes to this meeting of attention in such terms as it has found.

Law, loss, chaos, shame and lies

Comments into this page into the theme of (international) law and lies.

In reply to Stern Daler who said
... But what is the use when it does not protect the weaker. IMHO Law is to protect the weaker not the stronger.
The redistribution of force or indeed an underlying judgement of guilt, invalidation and penalty, can lead to 'weakness' being given power - while the Law ITSELF holds that power. The idea of law is fundamental - and lawyers, like priests, can subvert and usurp just as can the iron fist that says "Because _I_ say so!" and uses terror and deceit to push out any rival 'god' and prevail over or hold in check that which cannot be eradicated dominated or subverted. Weaponized 'law' is the lie and the father of the lie - for it serves vengeance and self-specialness regardless the mask of 'fairness' distorted to use forms of 'accepted truths' only as such agenda can exploit.

The idea of law has two facets - and one is of limiting loss or chaos and disorder - but according to WHOSE plan or set of definitions? The other is of a just and equal meeting of needs in a wholeness of being - and within the self-conflicted, there is no felt relation or recognition OF wholeness of being - but only a sense of the loss of such at another's hand - and the inability to resume or regain such a life until vengeance serves justice.

We have in these times a complex entanglement in 'power struggles' that are also identity conflict, managed under the definitions and terms by which we identify ourselves and our reality. Power resides in the capacity to recognize truly - for deceits - knowing or unknowing, breed conflicted and entangled outcomes - regardless any temporary seeming advantage to one over another. The narrative reality is a masking reality - indeed a kind of 'augmented' reality experience - and cares not what system of governance (identity) you think you have as long as it has this central currency control.

Law seems to be asserted and imposed upon us in many ways extremely unfairly, and to be often toothless in will or capacity to protect against violation as a result of its own corruption. I see 'power' put outside ourselves whether in grievance at being unfairly treated or in supplication to a power of vengeance brought 'on side' or co-opted to force into balance by equal and opposite reaction.

I often am reminded of the saying to give unto God what is due unto God and to give unto Caesar what is due unto Caesar. Many cannot begin to feel into this because their identification forbids it. But the Law of our unfoldment of being is not narrative control - where worldly power is the 'jealous god syndrome' whether masked in the FORMS of religion, medicine, science, or political or philosophic discourse.

So the FORMS of things that symbolize truths beyond objective definition - are used to mask and protect a lie of self-specialness whose first consciousness is of being victim to abandonment or violation - upon which it build dissociated identities of entangled special 'loves' and corresponding hatreds.

I see the highest potentials of our healing in genuine communication - but mark that our conceptual currencies of thought have been built to DENY and defend AGAINST this - and that reclaiming a true communication within and among us is counter to millennia of conditioning. However, it rises from a point of recognition that is outside the 'box' of fear-controlled survival dictates - and grows a capacity of noticing and discernment that fear forbids - even while seeming to operate as protector. The idea of Law is of yielding to true - and this is not coercive upon anyone - but must be seen as such by any coercive attempt - for we see in terms of our own undercurrent beliefs.

Truth is not 'determined' so much as uncovered by a willingness for it. Identity politics - on any level - operates assertion over truth that distorts and filters only to allow what that identity allows. Because the manipulative intent of such 'identity' is becoming more openly visible, we may recognize the pattern at work in all - rather than exclusively fixated in target-others. The recognition of the deceiver - as I use this term - is of its futility and meaninglessness of persisting in. But the targeting of hate in the other, overlooks the hook within the bait - and willingly recycles a persistence in what can only deprive and deny a true inheritance of being in exchange for a false. Entrance the matrix of a 'managed reality' here - or put it behind in a fresh willingness for true alignment.

The outer can only reflect the inner and the denial or evasion of the inner can only play out as tyrannous denials of our right to be in external terms. I find hatred for the murder and enslavement of my fellow beings - and yet that toxic wish for the power to STOP it, has a correspondence in my own 'narrative control' identity.

Perhaps no one releases vengeance until its false god really hits home. Self-hatred - denied - mounts ever more actively us the undercurrent of a masking reality - and now that mask itself breaks down and 'chaos' breaks in everywhere against a futile and utterly corrupted attempt to 'control' it. These are one and the same.
Loss of control is really loss of communication - and the false world that arose like a fig leaf over such a shame is predicated upon terror that re-enacts  the breakdown OF communication in terms that set the compulsion to regain it.

If a choice is between lies - what choice is that but power struggle under rule of deceit?
But the nature of the mind of deceit to hide from shame of exposure and undoing is to 'know not what it does' by investing forcefully in a narrative dissociations taken as real. Who believes that the deceits of the 'Enemy' must be studied, acquired and used against them - is already the thing they say they hate. For the 'goal' is set to justify any means - but a goal set by terror is aligning everything negatively - as is becoming apparent even in 'mainstreamed-mind'.


In reply to CF's commenting:


The monstrosity that is the MSM, truly boggles the mind. How can they live with themselves? All these lies, false accusations and bullsh*t against Russia and Assad and for what? Money? Have they no shame? I guess not or else the would not be the MSM.
If it is seen as a weapon – no more, no less, then it serves that purpose in those who use it.
The capacity to lie with conviction is – in my opinion – the worship of the lie AS power over truth. Thus "Truth is Dead. Never Existed and is thus only what power dictates".
Power corrupts because everything is redefined in its terms and to serve its ends.
Money is also weaponised and is not an end in itself.
Bear in mind that the brutal suppression of others by conquest and enslavement is nothing new. It has not suddenly started happening – but the illusions that have covered over its acting out are disintegrating.

Wednesday, 10 May 2017

Heart Dis-ease

An article on Natural News on 'heart disease - a different perspective' brought my informational response but then a deeper reflection of 'what lies beneath'.
I felt to put the whole response here and link from the article

- - -

I expected information from Knut Sroka http://heartattacknew.com/
I feel this is worthy information. I discovered via Dr Thomas Cowan - who has an interview with Dr Mercola.

NOTE also Vit K2 removes calcium from arteries and soft tissue to bones etc - so VK2 deficiency is something to remedy as part of the false food fallout.


My own 'take' is that terror, rage and heartbreak are lidded or covered over by a system of suppression we call consciousness - but which in a sense is an anti-consciousness of 'mind' as control over the true spontaneity of being. A spontaneity that is not control, but is Creation Itself.

While humanity may be seen as a fragmentation of dissociated trauma-reaction operating an attempt to force 'reality' into shape - and doing so in the same patterning that forced or induced fragmentation as the 'split of(f) mind' - we may also be seen as the growing willingness for acceptance and unfoldment of true appreciation rather than persist the patterns of reactive identity.

You don't need a doctor to see that un-held and unhealed psychic-emotional stress can kill you, as well as patterning our biology and relational identity to exactly replicate war on Self in false flagged disguise. Fear-defined self can only result in fearful outcomes - regardless the attraction to forms of war that seem to offer power and protection of status, privilege and lording it over others.

The war on Self is defence of a wish in place of true willing. An image of self in place of truly felt relation. A concept of truth in substitution for wholeness of being - that attacks the 'other' for what itself (blindly) does - AS the basis for operating a private agenda under a sense of sanctified or justified grievance.

The healing or re-wakening of the wholeness of being cant really be taken out of our relational context of reactive triggered conditioning. Living the willingness for healing meets the 'territory' that otherwise is associated with a negative and abhorrent sense of self/other. The movement of being is an Innate Innocence of being - and yet is framed with associations that effectively demonize with projected and denied hate and fear. So when our life Speaks or Stirs within us - we may not have the preparedness and willingness to accept and flow with or yield to our truth - which is nothing to do with the assertion of 'mind', but is the welcome to true hearted being rather than its control or suppression.

Opening to self-honesty is both to joy in being - and to the conditioned reactive hate and fear that are by design, 'unconscious' or dissociated in their re-enacting a false and forced sense of self power and protection. But the latter become the basis of a deeper or more integrated recognition and hence a greater joy in being.

Seeking to resolve psychic-emotional conflict out in the 'physicalized' world is the persistence of a displacement and dissociation that defines physical reflection as an Otherness of threat, treachery, abandonment and disappointment. And while this belief is itself too fearful to bring to curiosity, we have to accommodate to its 'reality'. It isn't just that fear hidden in guilt kills - but that it can be so painful as to seek death as escape or so enraging as to yield to hateful defiance of refusal to feel or own or know - anything hate rules out. But hate is a hurt love however it presents, and love is true freedom of being; given and received - so hurt is a covering over the heart that refuses the embrace of that which heals it when it directs blame in guilt.

True self-forgiveness opens to Presence now - that no image or concept can define, predict, or control. Nor within the movement of being the true of You - is there such a call to separate from Experience as if to lord it or hide in fear and subjection. But none can release that which they know not they do - so owning the mistake as mistake is the moment of its release as if true. Truth 'enters' freely to welcome as insight of expanded perspective in which re-integration of a shifted sense of self and reality acts in greater alignment or congruency of being.

Wednesday, 12 April 2017

Galactic Intimacy - unrecognized and rejected


Elon Musk: "If there are super intelligent aliens, they're probably already observing us"


To the article and commenting: (Not into the framing of 'alien intelligence but to the estrangement from our own):



Consider, the world you perceive is the the world you believe. The mind of fragmentation, conflict and dissociated attempts to redefine reality in narrative domination - is itself fragmented, conflicted dissociation from Coherence of being. This is the 'Fall' or the Separation.

Within the belief that such conflict can be won and that such victory is meaningful... is no remembrance of unified purpose. A state of Forgetting.

The labelling of evil as 'psychopathic' is another term for projected excommunication.

All relations and communications embody vibrational correspondences of thought at some level that may not be conscious, for the surface consciousness limits by design - so as to operate above the dark of unwatched and unowned unconscious.

The world you meet - the qualities you meet or draw forth in others - and they in you are not fixed, external physical entities - but so has the mind trained itself to perceive and believe.

Victim-hood is part of the tool-set for tricking the mind to believe itself split off and escaped from unwanted consciousness. It projects the cause externally (away) and WANTS it there with all the force of its intent to escape, amidst the reflection of such force as trauma of conflict - regardless of shifting roles - that becomes a self-perpetuating negative loop.

Beliefs that are professed to -  that are not free of need for validation - are seeking reinforcement. Which is the belief in lack, frailty and weakness - for wholeness is not self-conflicted doubt, seeking ascendency.

Realities ARE beliefs unrecognized. Operating at a level the surface mind was made to hide - because it is the unfolding of the belief in act.
Negative - and I mean divisive, segregative and conflicting self-definition - may cast itself in an apparently positive spin. Hence the wish of a 'positive' is a hidden or unfaced and un-owned negative. To will - that is to truly desire - a positive - or integrative, expanding and embracing perspective -  embraces the negative experience as part of uncovering its own correspondence or 'entanglement' within it. Releasing false self, releasing judgement of another - these are the same but seem not in a world of believing they are different. You cannot follow or recognize this thought this in the wish and belief you are 'different' - you can only receive the recognition in a 'sameness'. Attempts to fit or force the Living into the framework of conflicted thinking persists the sacrifice of Life to dead concept, image and symbol - for you are none of these - and never could be.

Re-integrating a conflicted consciousness is through a willingness - yet from the point of view of an attempt to conquer or possess and control Life, it may seem a violation, insult and ultimate defeat - AS IF at the hand of another. You can align in true will now, or defer to delay - but a false will cannot but make dissonant. This dissonance has been made the call to guilt. But it is simply a Call to wake - and realign in joy - for such is a unified wholeness of being.

The Plane you resonate and focus in - in any given moment of acceptance - is your 'chosen' reality experience. This 'choice' is not truly choice so much as freedom of being you. But the choice to be something else has made 'freedom' of slavery that fears true freedom as if it were slavery. So what you want, what you desire and prefer, is operating either from a heartfelt honesty - or a routine of sub-conscious responses of attempt to escape a self - and world - defined in conflict and fear of loss.

Insofar as 'evils' mark the way you say you DO NOT want - use them as waymarkers for thinking you now choose not to give allegiance and support to. Remember Jesus said 'resist ye not evil' - and know that what you resist, persists. If an evil persists in your reality-experience, then it is serving some meaning or function for you. Let this stir curiosity instead of blame.

Your worthiness for love's awareness and embrace requires no one else to be damned or demonized to be all that you are. What then of blind, hate, malice, envy, vengeance then? Attend the cause to let  the causeless be revealed.

In the nature of mind or consciousness - truly - giving and receiving are one; As you give so shall you receive - for nothing can prevail against your will. In giving false witness - you receive it, and in treating life as slave or lab-rat, so do you find yourself subjected regardless the mind-spin of being the right to power. True relationship has to yield assertion, to truly receive. Are you in any degree willing for an intimacy of being the mind cannot interject, much less control? If so - then you are such an awareness unfolding - and if not yet - then you insist on seeing and interpreting Life in terms OF an interjecting control, in conflict, fear, struggle and destruction. THAT is where we came IN. But now are you in some willingness of new eyes to see?

If you could go back in time to where it 'all went haywire' and make a different choice... well here you are - and the choice is already made FOR your acceptance. Self hate or rejection makes non Sense. But making is not true Creation so much as an anti-Creation in wish, given allegiant identity.

Monday, 10 April 2017

Is it bad for you?

The dietary video this was written to is without merit but the comment has a general message:


When fear tells you what to do - and what not to do - you no longer need a mind of your own or a heart to discern true - for you can now spout from - or hide behind - a presumed 'authority'.

When diversions keep your attention locked in what doesn't matter - and assigns it undue importance - you get a world where everything is backwards!


Balance from within is your living responsibility - where trying to force balance from without... is false - and futile.

Not blame but a true ability of response within the gift of being.

Taking some bits of some information that has some merit in some circumstances as if it is a conclusive knowledge is dressing up in play clothes. The desire to me more than you are is the fear you are less - and the release of such fear allows the more of what you truly are to embody. Having learned to seem to be what you are not, makes a situation of the need to re-learn or re-cognize who you are.

The biology is very complex synergy - just as the life-denying 'control mentality' sets up negative synergies. We are still uncovering radical new perspectives that cast all we THOUGHT we knew in a different light. So keep some brackets around ideas that resonate true with you so that there is room for expansion and change.

Confusion is a useful tool for the need to evade clarity - when clarity is confused with a fearful exposure. Clickbait keeps you clickin like a chicken licken - so do what you do and choose as you choose - from a truly connected place in yourself. If you don't know what that is - you are lost in a thinking-matrix as if to protect from feelings you buried back when.

Let anyone and everything 'tell' whatever they like. You are the quality of recognition as to what is truly resonant to you. Why trade your life in for a fear-minded sense of self-inflation?

Energy and joy are more than related. If you have to force yourself to perform or fear that you wont or cant - get down more honestly with what you really want. The mind can make symbols for connected being and seek to act them out - but then find no connection there either. Start from where you want to arrive in a more expanded appreciation - like gratitude - for example.

Living without Free Will?

 Living Without Free Will ; Susan Blackmore

at the Science and non-duality conference. What does she think she is doing?



The usurping of the will by a split mind operates an illusion of freedom to choose between - as if independent from. This sense of self is the so called waking conscious mind - which is largely defined and predicated upon what it is unconscious of.

Clearly actions arise from a formulation of reality and a triggering of past conditioning that runs as a subconscious routine with unconscious elements. In fact the action of keeping unconscious what is not acceptable operates as the primary defence OF a masked presentation of self that is hardly 'in control' - and is yet invested with the need and obligation for control and compliance within its accepted reality - because it is disconnected from true willing by design. True feelings, true desires are not generally felt safe to embody in a world of judgement, blame and rejection.

But the word 'accept' is where choice truly exists - for in choosing to accept a masking off or dissociation of self for whatever reasons in early life, one now has the freedom to own that choice as a choice and change it for another. So if finding social acceptance and validation from others has driven your behaviours - you can notice this as  pattern of dissonance if indeed it is not really living the life that moves you (free will) but conforming to beliefs and ideas that do not (or no longer) serve you. So you are free to refuse to accept what you recognize is not You and costs you the fuller experience of your living - as the more aligned focus in who you do recognize yourself to be. But you are not free to become what you are not, though you may be free to attempt it - and defend the attempt - while it yet seems meaningful to you to do so. But freedom to submit to a compulsive or tyrannical substitute will is hardly a conscious appreciation of freedom!

Until thought itself is observed in act - there is only the term 'conscious thoughts' assigned meanings within a currency of thinking that operates the blocking of free awareness.
So what exactly is meant by free and by will? The mind in its act of defining, predicting and controlling outcomes is a conditioned reaction despite assigning itself to the pinnacle of evolution. It operates blind to the reality of who you truly are or who anyone or anything truly is - and cannot but be so while employed for the purpose of control.
Free will in its true sense is an allowing and balancing within a whole of which the mind in judgement cannot know.

The story of Jesus is of the yielding of a false sense of will for the alignment in the true. He called it the Father's Will - for it is of the whole for the whole - through the particular needs - that may not be what social mores dictate or expect. For true needs are denied by society predicated upon evading the fearful and diverting from the knowledge of the evasion in surface gratifications and observances.
Always your experience is the result of definitions you have accepted true of you in any particular situation. If you get this - your acceptance of your own recognition is your freedom to be curious as to exactly what core beliefs and definitions are playing into or setting up experience or patterns of relationship you say you don't want.

Your natural desire is 'prayer' in that it aligns and attracts to you the pathways that bring fulfilment. It doesn't need words or belief in a religious set of ideas - but being truly acknowledged consciously is no longer hiding or downplaying something that moves you.
The moment of suddenly noticing yourself in act - at the level of belief or definition can come in any kind of way and in different timings - but it is the awakening or stirring at a level the surface mind generally denies you - until you more persistently and consistently choose to release the illusion of control that fear triggers the need of - and embrace what you will freely. Even such an honesty aligns choices from otherwise drifting in self-negative habits - no matter how well camouflaged in apparently positive forms.

Life does not call for interference from the surface consciousness to unfold lawfully - in terms of being true to its foundation. It is the loss of the awareness of true foundation that set a mind scurrying for fig-leaf thinking in which to seem to be self-existing and self-determining. Uncovering this is an illusion is not another basis upon which to make a more subtle fig-leaved model of reality. The subjective experience of void, is a restoring of a true Unconscious - that is the wellspring of Life and not a well full of corpses with a heavy lid over it. Graphic metaphors, but terror operates the loss and denial or usurping of Will. And the only 'life' it permits is the sacrifice of your Sovereign will for a set of rules that become you. Or rather operate a placeholder where your true presence would be - were you to accept who you are - and live as if it is indeed true.


PS: God Gave You (created You) Free Will - so you are stuck with it eternally - whether you align in it for joy or determine to prove you have none or have a corrupt and evil will, or anything else your focus in thought and feeling of being generates. The subset of freedom regarding true and false - which is masked in the idea of good and evil, is simply that Reality, God or your being is NOT coercive upon you. But in coercing the will - you will generate dissonance that you may interpret as guilt and punishment - and seek to mitigate or out-source.One way of offloading guilt is to go around 'correcting' or undermining others - so as to be the one - or aligned in the power to deconstruct others and tell them what is true. But destroying is not creating - no matter how much gratification ones derives from the will to sacrifice others.


Hanniffy Dinn said to the video:

They don't get it. Your soul is in a higher dimension, your brain is quantum biology. It's just a receiver.

But they get what they are free to choose to tune into - just as you are in your experience. So Perhaps they are also serving your deepening recognition of how your consciousness focuses and 'tunes in'.

Sunday, 9 April 2017

Consciousness, space time, and reality



The Death of SpaceTime & Birth of Conscious Agents; Donald Hoffman

I didn't resonate to the push of the presentation linked above but offered a perspective to the theme:
(and joined some of the comments down the page).


The desire to blank out Creator - is the wish to spin your own. Creator and Creation are not two - but the wish to spin a different Theo-ry is the 'survival to propagate' urge - that Act-ively blanks truth by the play of apparently conflicting truths. The development of abilities of such a masked and masking 'reality' experience can be ascribed to an 'evolutionary narrative' or any other continuity narrative. But the obscuring of Creator is For-getting that loses the Soul of true Feeling Awareness for the mind of a sense of dissociated definition, prediction and control. This re-definition of a Living Inheritance as a private possession operates a focus within scarcity, struggle and loss. Time winds up to Now - when no more time can be interposed between Who you are and what a conditioned sense thinks to be. Creator is - and nothing Else is, but the capacity to know and appreciate Existence is given to that which is created to receive and share it.

So regardless the mapping of definitions of any local 'reality' the only Thing Going On is Always no more and no less than Infinity represented in finite terms. Look for the edges or boundaries to your experience and see there are none. Where are you not? The personality construct is a tool of instrumental focus of an 'Upstream' purpose that cannot be more than partially and therefore falsely defined in downstream terms - but can operate its true function through the synchronicity of such function - for wholeness of being is not a goal or a theory or a composite of fragmented and dissociated parts. It is simply Given to the quality of true receipt.

The sense of the lack-desire of the power to give (create) develops the mind (of) for Getting. As a usurping of power under another Name and Nature - that of the image and symbol of self. But this unfolding of experience in time - as continuity in time, for the split off (disociated) 'consciousness' of a surface waking focus, actually folds up to a recognition of the powerlessness (omega) that was and ever is its foundation AS a split-minded reality in which a partiality seems separate from its Whole - and active upon it as the idea of power - and the subjection no less to such power.

The recognition of error is is undoing in terms of passing off as true. Your self never was what thought took to be - no matter how many millennia of conditioned impressions generated its 'survival' AS You. The tools and abilities of developed consciousness may be associated with a fear -based and indeed gratification-based urge - but the re-Awakening (to) Creator as a quality of synchronous or timeless alignment, replaces the imaged thought-based purpose of 'me over and against the reality of Other' with the original Function revealed - rather than masked.

To ask what the meaning of life is is to demonstrate a dissociation from its unfolding fulfilment. That true meaning can be covered over with a shifting fragmentation of conflicted 'meanings' given identification and allegiance - and defended as one's self is evident - as is the transitory and hollow nature of such gratification. yet there is an alloy in our seeming love-hate world in that the false takes image or forms of true by which to pass off as if true. And so even in a life of struggle and suffering - intimations of the true of being rise and share as the function of Life fulfilled - regardless whether the egoic personality recognizes and appreciates this YET.

Timelessness is an inherent Quality of being and time and space are rendering of Now through a lens of a passed-mind made and held in secret - by which to act out its 'personae' as the drama of a sense of lack and loss - defended and presented in terms of power to persist and prevail over the 'other' that has been false-flagged as the cause of loss, of denial of deprivation. Reading the signs of the times as one's own reflection is not the persistence of a self invalidation seeking validation - but the feedback by which to re-integrate from a fragmented of split off sense of self to an integrative quality of being - that is already 'awaiting' recognition and acceptance, while the drama of a self at war with itself delays such re-Membering through the 'creation' of distance between - of space and of time.

I write this as a sketch from which resonance may stir. Truth is never the result of a contest - but narrative control is the assertion OF continuity in continuity in space and time. Continuity of Joy is of an Upstream discernment. The willingness to align in joy is not outer-defined but truly felt and truly embodying the unique signature vibration that is recognizably and intimately verifiably You. Simply being who you are is the unselfconsciously receiving and giving - of That You are. They are not two. The interjection of the mind does not come between - unless you want to believe it has and live that in place of true, as a temporary distortion. The capacity to NOT notice and indeed NOT know what Is, what You are, and all that is - is a highly developed tool. The purpose that set it up becomes redundant - but all tools and abilities can be re-purposed. Use time to re-waken awareness of the Eternal - instead of making 'processes' for a tomorrow that never comes. Different constructs and tools will arise as a result of true desire - but aligned to the resonance with joy-lived - rather than image-protected. The purpose of Communication makes Everything a language of being. Power is yielded to its true Source - from which it could never really leave or be taken - for there is no lack or loss in Creator/Creation. The acceptance of this is the willingness to give what you believed you lacked or were denied and deprived of. Feel the insult and the reversal of thought that this represents - and also the inability of the ego-sense to give anything BUT limitation - for it 'gives' but to get.

Creator is of an intimacy that none can come between - the generation of experience within the Infinite is not 'sin' but the persistence in a-tempt to prevail over true desire in false mind - generates the belief in 'sin' as it foundation in a 'justified' sense of power in opposition to a feared true.

- - -
Adur Alkain wrote (to the main article):
Very interesting! But if spacetime is not fundamental, "fitness" can't be fundamental either. I think the new theory should get rid of utitilarian notions like fitness (which as Hoffman explains is a very complicated function of the state of the world and the organism, etc., which again shows it's not fundamental) and adopt some more abstract notion like creativity. All spiritual teachings I know say that creativity is a fundamental dimension of reality, probably as fundamental as consciousness itself. To explain that we all seem to have similar perceptions of the world we don't need to resort to evolutionary explanations (we are similar organisms, the product of  a long evolution, etc.), but realize that on some (mostly unconscious) level we all share one same awareness or consciousness.

Mr Reply to Adur Alkain:

Fit for purpose - allows a fitting in with a wholeness - even when expressing in appearances of conflicting or competing parts. The usurping of a true whole-part recognition is the idea of separate powers in a separate 'world'. The Creative can be 'sacrificed' to mythology - but only while the focus in such a role is fed or supported by a sense of purpose accepted meaningful.

The purpose in establishing such an experience is having the experience for what it yields. But when that purpose itself yields to true creative being - the definitions that frame an UN-fitting and un-fit reality rise to be re-evaluated in terms of resonance and relevance to the true of you. Nothing (no one) else can fit your part BUT you.

But I agree. taking parts of the new wine perspective and yet stuffing them into old paradigm bottles is a way to make more time - or delay recognition and appreciation for being - in sacrifice to some idea of a future becoming - set by a past conditioning. Creative is being. But patterns of conditioned response operate the same 'choice' as if a freedom to choose apart from and without the Creator-Nature of all being.

Love wists where it will - but it is not random - though of course our reality experience includes experience of what seems random within a limited framework. Unconsciousness is in fact the shadow of what is assigned and accepted to consciousness. Stuffing reality 'out of mind' is a clever way to seem to create a separate mind. Clever because it is not a true creation that extends shared Conscious Reality - but rather a derivative of a conflicted or contradictory idea.

The persistence and propagation of idea given focus is natural enough - and yet the compulsive dictate of fear and its derivatives is not the true movement of support for being. Until yielded to the Creative, mind usurps everything. That was its job description when we thought to climb into the movie frame.

Investment in (or suppression of) outcomes via force, rather than unfolding of being through communication (on all levels and dimensionalities of being). The latter remains true while the former seems to 'run the show' - but seeming requires force to pass off as true - and thus all that would not 'fit' is suppressed, inhibited, denied and blanked to 'unconsciousness'. Forced reality is a private protection racket - that seems to share by enforcing compliance.

In a sense everything experiencable is a 'reality' but not everything resonates relevant to who you are being the movement or focus of Now - and so accepting all of who you are will release some of what you thought true and accept the embrace of much that such a false sense denied (rendered unconscious). This is experienced as a shift of perspective from time to timeless and the conscious appreciation and gratitude for the sharing by which experience itself is beheld - or co-created.

The 'floor disappears out from under' and yet a deeper quality of balance is uncovered within the flow of the whole. So as the extension of a true recognition and appreciation of reality - we are not asserting and projecting the idea of conflict and then receiving its reflection AS our world.

R Littlefield wrote (to the main article):

I tried to listen with an open mind.  Sorry, this guy's god is evolution.  Little does he know that if there is no God then it does not mean evolution happened. In fact the evidence is against it. The evidence is for punctuated equilibrium.

In Reply :

It really depends on where you are looking from. A mess of a fragmented mind 'sees' a mess of random stuff OUT THERE to maintain a semblance of inner equilibrium - as the assertion of its definition of 'reality'. But consider, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Consider that 'garbage in; garbage out, is also an example of equilibrium. What you give out is what you get back - as ye sow so shall ye reap. Of course anyone CAN experience reality in whatever way their model, beliefs and definitions dictate - which may be more or less coherent - but does incoherence change your mind? Perhaps - but not while projecting mind OUT THERE ad disowning it.


Messi The King wrote (to the main article):
space cant die. it isnt a thing to die..space is pure vaccum. time cannot die either. time didnt born to die. time is real tho.


My reply to Messi:

It is the belief in space-time as fixed and fundamental that 'dies'. While something receives focus of acceptence as true for you - it 'lives' in you because You are Life - and give it to everything in your experience - (just as it gives you).

Gregory Baillie wrote (to the main article):
Unconvincing. It's brilliance is the avalanche of seemingly related but interesting conceptualizations in the delivery. Just more convoluted abstraction dressed up as brilliance. Another theory. If I don't duck the cricket ball in time I might sustain a fractured skull . If I duck the ball in time I will not sustain a fractured skull. For all intents and purposes in this part of the spectrum of reality, there is a ball to duck.The rest is just clever conversation.

In Reply to Gregory Baillie:

IF you duck and IF your don't - is another theory... ?

You are ducked out of what is NOT meeting your awareness now and you ARE meeting what is. Always. How you choose to interpret and relate to what is - is not a theory - in its results - so know by your fruits - that is check the feedback as feedback - rather than manipulate the feedback as if IT is the cause and not a symptom.

I was once hit by a cricket ball smack in the forehead - did a backward somersault - which I had never done before or since. I noticed a 'stage' to play in a microsecond - without any hesitation or thought of injury - is that weird - that's how I recall it (50 years back now - and no injury).

The word misalignment is just a term for the alignment of something unintended, unexpected or unwanted - but it arrives perfectly on time. But I don't argue with you - there is no need to be convinced by anyone's show.

I don't resonate with the vid overall. That's all I need to know - and move on to what does. Trying to THINK or define reality is an absurd arrogance - but a willingness to share - really - can join in ideas that reflect inner recognition.


Scot Turley Sayeth to the main article:

Conscious agents cannot be something separate from the external reality. They must be part of it in order for evolution to work. Evolution is a causal process, so how can evolution be real, while causality is not?


In Reply to Scot Turly:

Are 'conscious agents' that resonant facet of an apparently 'external reality' that is synchronous with Who/What you truly are - regardless the temporary limit of a focus associated with your 'internal reality'?

Another way of putting this in A Course In Miracles terms is "The Holy Spirit uses everything in your mind (experience of reality - and therefore your world) to teach you about your mind. For a mind operating its conditioned belief is unable to see or change its programming until something reflects THAT reality is NOT what you think - but that what you think MAKES your perception of it and sets the terms of your response.

If the programming was an attempt to GET free of a feared or hated reality - then EVERYTHING following on from this is operating a negatively defined sense of self, life and freedom.

Everything is BACKWARDS; everything is upside down! Doctors destroy health, Lawyers destroy justice, Universities destroy knowledge, Governments destroy freedom, Major media destroys information, And religions destroy spirituality". (Michael Ellner).

Everyone can blame everyone else - but that heals nothing and only persists the same old same old.

What are 'unconscious agents' but your own projected denials - be they fear, rage or shame - that operate as 'black ops' in your name, with your energy under the ruse of power and protection.

Embracing your 'shadow' is owning what is yours - so as to let it align in who you NOW accept and choose yourself to be. For I am not who I once believed I was - and thus open choices my mind ruled out - or hid.

Scot Turley replied to me:
Seems that you are very sure of yourself. You've got the whole world pinned down. But how can anyone else know that any of what you said is true? They cannot. That is the difference between that type of thinking, and the scientific world view. The later can be independently verified. Many people use that phrase "what we really are." Yet, they cannot provide any explanation of what that is, and how it operates, or any way they we can test the hypothesis. Maybe we are all are exactly what we appear to be, an accidental chemical process, occurring on a tiny little rock, in a vast, empty, and meaningless universe. The only reason that this explanation is not completely accepted by the general public is because the majority of people are uncomfortable with the idea that their entire existence can be reduced to a couple pounds of fragile transitory gelatinous tissue.
 To Scot I replied:

If equating the true of your existence with "a couple pounds of fragile transitory gelatinous tissue." works for you - why not go for it and have your experience that-a-ways? If you limit your self to body - then mind is not creative and feeling is not felt - for everything is sacrificed to the model or idol - of your accepted belief - regardless how many measure your body and proclaim the truth.
When a model requires sacrifice of life to protect the model - it is no longer serving life-function - but an anti-life or destructive function.

The positing of existence upon any kind of thinking is an absence of the feeling of existence. Feeling Existence is not an emotional state - but a Quantum state. The mental programming associated with the physical personality runs as an overlay or virtual reality upon the Totality - and is completely divorced from awareness of its actual underpinnings unless and until a resonance of 'contact' occurs - in which the stirrings of being - (for which there is no basis on mind to understand or relate to) - grows a channel of communication through the reconfiguring of the personality. It doesn't matter what narrative form this takes so much as that it serves purpose of opening to the movement of one's being. This communication is not acceptable to those whose sense of self, security and identity lies in their being private, independent of autonomous - all of which are illusions - for in every thought or act the Whole Universe participates - at every level - because ONLY in thought is there a sense of separation - and that thought is 'safe' in the idea of frailty, littleness and death - for all these things 'prove' its temporary limited existence - as separated off from a Totality that is denied to a surface awareness BY the very nature of the personality structure - for that is the 'ticket' into the focus of an 'incarnation' or human lifetime.

Equilibrium is always the Nature of Existence - but the awareness and recognition of that is by definition excluded by a partiality accorded exclusivity. You don't appear to me to be an accidental chemical process - but a communication of an energetic in which I open and share in. Communication includes quantum entanglement - and our verbal-mental is no more determining of the quality of that communication than are genes to the instantaneous communications through the DNA of every part to every part within the whole - at once - billions of times per second...

The thing about looking at the mechanism - is that at first it reveals the Mind of Creator, then it reveals the mechanism running innately - with no external Creator, then it reveals the Creator has NOTHING external to it - in any instant - ever! The fear of Totality is a fragmented incoherence - like a jamming signal to fully open knowing. I don't ask or expect you or anyone to believe anything I say, but I invite you to consider expanding your definitions instead of locking down in them as if they save you from your worst fears. They embody those fears and persist them - until these become truly conscious - which cannot occur while the mind operates the attempt to separate or dissociate from them and overcome or resolve them 'externally' - which cannot work - because the cause is not external reflection, but the inner conception. As a man thinketh in his heart - so is he. The surface mind masks the heart and substitutes for it - until it runs out of ability to make more 'time'. Our true thought is hidden from us - in the main - by a cover story.

The 'public' are generally armoured and conditioned to a conformity whereby not to attract pain asociated with rage and terror. So a world of mutually reinforcing 'forms' masks as reality and is sacrificed to as true. Research where society (corporate cartel monopoly) supports you and don't go in the directions that expose or challenge the model they are invested in (and too big to fail) - or you will be persecuted or blanked off and denied for the truth - as always.

I have the whole world opened up - not pinned down - but only join in this as a free willingness - and never by coercion, deceit or persuasive manipulation. You can recognize 'who you really are' by the total absence of coercion, deceit or persuasive manipulation. Everyone has the capacity to feel this. But the 'world' we learned and adapted to, is not one of unconditional recognition and acceptance - but of blind masked presentation - to survive and to bear surviving. Who wants to re-view 'separation trauma' that society operates to conceal? Yet the underlying script operates regardless the forms of evasion. Fears operate humanity - even through the very attempts to make sure it wont happen again. It's in our template as a conflicted sense of self and existence. Hiding from this does not resolve anything - but hiding so well as to forget - and defending the forgetting as survival - is the belief we are alone and the exchange of an intimately relational Creation for stuff and others to exploit, use up and gratify a passing sense of self-inflation upon.


Open-minded Skeptic sayeth to the main article:

Space-time, it's been good to know ya. But you are no longer fundamental. Get used to it.

In reply to Open-minded Skeptic:

Welcome to Time-space. NOW opens to Joy Synchronicity instead of sausage-moments joined together by fear-narrative. The fundamental nature of reality is that you can never get used to it - because it is Always New. Clearly Ideas unfold their own inner quality to experience - and hold all the time they need.

Sunday, 2 April 2017

Are wars what they seem? - ACIM - Hidden hate

Does this 'ruling power class' actually fight among its own - or does it enact a sacrificial blood-letting upon which to engorge and gratify a sense of power over life? The very idea of power - as we generally use it, corrupts.

Is it meaningful to regard corporate or national 'powers' or their apparent leaders as discrete entities?
Are they puppet masters or themselves puppet to ideas they know not of?

Do we in turn align in a similar posture of 'someone else must pay' so that not to lose our face.
Do we hate the hidden hate and fear that our masking, faces away from, so as to seem or pass off without exposure?
Is the human story of discovery, possession and control, a cover story over a great human evasion - the fact of which is the last thing we would notice?

To what degree is an autonomous sense of freedom and independence (from such exposure) an automaton or golem, driven by a willingness to sacrifice for power in blame, rejection and denial?
Does the acceptance and enacting of a false mind or usurping narrative identity, align us in support of the very thing we say we hate? As in the metaphor of the 'Matrix' where what seems a 'life' is part of a battery system of support for that which feeds illusions in return for life-energy?

I cannot go 'deeper' in anyone else's perspective. I can only look within and be listen or feel there. Intimacy is associated with the despoiling, loss and betrayal of love and life. But an actual intimacy is none of these things.
The generation of conflict keeps us 'safe' from knowing anything true. But 'someone must pay'.

- - -

 Are wars what they seem - a struggle between powers? Or are they the mind's power to assert a conflicted state upon the power of life, so as to sow division and confusion by which to exploit and manipulate fragmented and polarised minds, unlike and other?
Is not much of the trouble abroad a means to divert from and persist in trouble at home?
And the trouble at home presented as provocation by which to be baited into intended and directed reaction?

The 'US' is being used - as most else is being used - by the purpose of deceit or self-illusion.
Deceit frames and suggests illusion as true. But our investment in the illusion of power demands sacrifice of true in allegiance to its god - as our 'self'. False-framed reality is increasing obvious as a narrative that 'controls' the setting and range of choices available. To react within the framing is to have taken the bait and chosen to play out the role accorded by unconscious urges through which manipulators work.

This next para from my daily reading of a work I find a greater sense of communication than words:
"How does one overcome illusions? Surely not by force or anger. Nor by OPPOSING them in ANY way. Merely by letting reason tell you that they CONTRADICT reality. They GO AGAINST what must be true. The opposition comes from THEM, and NOT reality. Reality opposes nothing. What merely is, NEEDS no defense, and offers none. Only illusions need defense, BECAUSE OF WEAKNESS. And how CAN it be difficult to walk the way of truth, when only WEAKNESS interferes? YOU are the strong ones in this seeming conflict. And you need NO defense. Everything that needs defense YOU DO NOT WANT. For anything that needs defense will WEAKEN you." (ACIM)

Sovereignty of will, (freedom in being) is usurped by the attempt to empower a separate mind as a body over other bodies and over its world. What is a separate mind? Secret or masked intent and agenda that SEEMS to relate and communicate while actually operating to obfuscate and disrupt communication so as to redefine reality in its own image and terms. If this program should pause even a moment - the true will rises as the recognition one does not want it, and this truth accepted, releases allegiance and resort to it for self.

Does a war-based mind seek war? Always and in all ways. Rule out division instead of the tempt to rule out from it. The war-minded cannot turn this around. Our mind-set has to be re-evaluated from a perspective beyond its own framing. This is the choice we do not know we are making... until such perspective finds our mind un-clothed - despite all presentations to the contrary.

The wish for war is the refusal to open to a true relational communication. The wish that overrides true desire is the father of the lie. What else but war can come of forcing against your own will as the wish for power over life - in place of living within the power of life? No one wants to lose this power - and so no one sees the true cost of pain and loss that its allegiance demands. For such exposure is denied by 'seeing' the fault in others and war must force them to comply or deny them life.

- - -
David S asked me - in two separate posts on this page: what is ACIM?
# 1. A Course in Miracles. ACIM. A tool is not more or less than the purpose for which it is used. While the active purpose is a desire for true sanity of coherence and congruity, of being, then not only will everything in our mind and world be fitted to such purpose - but we attract into our life, things, relationships, events, thoughts and teachings that resonate with our desire. ACIM is an example of such for me - but there are as many forms of the Universal Course as there are individuals to recognize and accept truth because it is true.
Inspirations can serve as a tuning fork by which to recognize and release the dissonant - rather than persist in the struggle of seeking to make true as if to gain validation from struggle.
A Course in Miracles is released from copyright and can be freely accessed online or purchased in print. Resonance and relevance to who we truly feel ourselves to be is no necessarily the linear development of a set identity.

#2. I answered somewhat in another post reply to you. What it is intended to be and what it is used for may be at variance - that is the freedom to accept or delay. But in terms of the world A Course in Miracles is a Text, a Workbook and a Manual for teachers, by which to recognize and re-align the mind to teach and learn from an unconflicted source and nature - even amidst the results of having taught and learned conflict - and taken it to be  our world or reality. So among other things, a miracle in this context, is a shift of perspective when a false sense of causality is released... along with the symptoms that it embodied - in timing of willingness to accept.

While the Course may seem abstract or otherworldly - one can see example in such things of our world as fake currency of narrative invested and believed from which outcomes follow as inevitable effect to the believed and accepted cause. One can point to this with the term 'ego' or 'WW3' - but one is the wish-belief from which the symptoms arise and witness to. Only in general we don't call or see such beliefs, while they operate as (accepted) reality.
I know I answered twice. I simply enjoyed doing so. But your joy is your own path of an unfolding discovery - if you will - and meets what serves you in who you are the being of. I say this because I don't see different sources of inspiration as being of conflicted purpose - regardless their form - if the embodiment of them in our lives is a receptivity to and honouring of the freedom of each other.


- - -
Seraskier responded:

[[ Are wars what they seem – a struggle between powers? ]] 
Oh no, all that stuff about powers is long forgotten.
Wars are the means by which multinational weapons corporations keep their businesses running smoothly. No-one cares about countries or powers any longer.

My response:

You are somewhat saying what my ‘question’ implied, for the acting out of competing ‘powers’ is nurtured as the narrative for public consumption – by which indeed a population may be literally entrained and consumed.

The mind-capture beneath market share, asset stripping and power fed thereby, is subtler and more pervasively inhibiting of freedom to live and grow from within. Indeed such a technocracy of systemic imposition replaces the relational field with the ‘mind’ of the automaton. Life lived is out of bounds – save as a carrot by which to come under the stick.

The consolidation of power – as the world worships power – operates corporately across boundaries and beneath and behind the scenes such that in due turn – those means that were used to break the old patterns will themselves be broken – so that no threat or rival will exist or rise but to be cut off or shut down. This creeping paralysis holds a horror that turns a mind away to focus instead in the dynamics of conflict – as if it can be won, or in distraction – as if it can actually escape.

Perhaps it becomes clearer now, that the power of illusion, operates an illusion of power, that baited carrot by which to forget the true by eliciting investment in the false and the accepting of its framing as our thinking. Fear of loss of power to not suffer further hurt or loss, sets the mind into unquestioning compliance, while compensatory identities express rebellion along the various templates provided or subverted.

But the power of illusion is the embodiment of creative imagination – and does not have to be focused within and harnessed to the war-mind of a weaponised and marketized identity. Nothing has built in or fixed meaning – unless your mind says so and you choose to believe it and act as if true.
RT says ‘question more’. I suggest to ‘Question Everything! For the basis upon which we think and feel, provides the perception-experience to which we automatically react. Becoming self-aware of our conditioning is an expansion of creative possibility – but not when addicted to the fix of an old identity-investment. I see that running dry, cutting off its own supply and masking powerlessness with every kind of nonsense – to which sacrifice must be made so as not to allow exposure. Yet what is that but fear of pain and loss! Is this actually the god we seek to appease? Is this the thinking that is given priority beneath our scenes?

Running on a negative self-definition can only result in a negative result. Imposing and enforcing an overlay of apparently positive spin not only compounds the error, it fakes, dilutes and undermines the true positive. A demon-fear given protection, becomes the demonizing of our joy. It turns life inside out and back to front. Everything is backwards! (So take of the mind-adjuster).

What is the ‘self’ exactly? For we are in effect acting from what we accept to be true for us in each and every moment. …Is it true…? How much exposure to self-honesty can we access or allow?

- - -

Dead World Walking commented into this page:

The insatiable, avaricious psychopaths who rule the planet will not rest from their quest of complete economic domination. We, the people, must resist.
For the sake of our children and the Earth.
I empathise with your feeling - but I call to resist the temptation to align in hate. Feel it...? Yes; there is hurt within hate and a deep sense of violation of life being different than it 'should be' . So heartbreak is beneath the pain that set a heartlessness of unfeeling to anything that triggers the threat and pattern of the violation or betrayal of trust. The journey I sketch is what the 'psychopathic' mind embodies the denial and refusal of. You can recognize your own resonance with any energetic by its triggering your own sympathetic vibrations - for hating the hater is the propagation and reinforcement of a focus in hate.

Economic domination is a false economy. True economy balances and flows and works or not - and there is only limited capacity to argue with the truth of what fails to support life - for we kill ourself to do so.
So I call on 'King Midas' to remind us that if we make a symbol of wealth the context of our world - and sacrifice all else to its 'rules' - then we lose the Living of a relational dance in life - for the static and meaningless idol.

You can only free yourself from tyranny of fear (hate) or false thinking (idols instead of the Living) - by truly living this moment and this day. Yet you can't do that alone in isolating thought that rules out the felt quality of your relationship with others, with your world. So for the love of Life on Earth - resist the temptation to engage or persist in loveless thinking no matter how it presents itself. Love isn't as the deceit-mind says - it is the movement and presence of life - free of the deceits that sacrifice true to have to keep up a masking compliance.

Making a new name by which to deny others is seeded by the energetic of denial - but once established, expands its usage to include others who don't comply with imposed rules set to 'save us' and therefore are associated with the evil set against us.

But for sure, address criminal behaviour and call out deceits for what they are.
Beware becoming framed and set in terms that hack your own life to operate a hate agenda.
Pathology of psychic-emotional relationship and communication is basically the fracture of trauma that re-enacts itself through the millennia.

- - -

PsyOp defences

(Further activity on the off-guardian on 'Russian hacking' psyops):

(To a commenter who wondered what the diversionary tactic was defending against being uncovered)
 

Psychological defences operate against exposure, feared and believed and lived as a 'reality' to never be repeated - ie: associated with conditioned psychic-emotional trauma.
As long as one engages the defence - one plays the same game in shifting roles.  I don't believe it possible to understand the nature of such 'defences' without meeting and moving through our own. The name, blame and shame game persists a narrative assertion upon one's reality that overrides the true in a movement of self-survival - within the conditioned framing of the mind-fragmentation passing off as 'self'.

For political issues there will be a variety of causes that are themselves symptoms.  In a sense there is the 'way things work' at the level of social agreements - that one usually conforms to as the parameters in which to NOT attract penalty and perhaps to find a measure of success. Corruption is systematic. The system itself has to be challenged - alongside whatever else we are moved or obliged to do. Systems are ideas  accorded currency by adoption and acceptance. So challenging the system begins with suspending allegiance and agreement to a pervasive insanity regardless the fact that it will make you seem to be the insane one.

First, change the world you perceive and react as real - and then you are in the territory of discovering what is operating beneath the masking that you used to simply blindly operate as if true. Name, blame and shame wont allow this to happen - and the crab-barrel world will pull you back into its own. So one has to WANT truth enough to pause and challenge the mind of guilt - which may seem mostly everyone else's - but then that was what it was assigned to do. Self-guilt in any pervasive belief, operates a crippling and self-destructive agenda - generally under 'good intentions' as the spin of seeming to offset or validate an invalid sense of self. Exposure to your true nature may be felt as damning of healing - depending on your alignment with true - or an attempt to make something true that by definition sacrifices truth to a seeming - that doesn't become any more true no matter how many and what force is invested in pushing it.

The whole global 'Economy' - and all its agencies - is a pack of cards. This is not just banking, but pharma , military and energy cartels, and the whole of the institutional establishment that has been subverted to their influence. The world we think we know is false. But this disclosure is itself potentially psychotic. My sense is that everything is coming up (from a suppressed and denied unconscious) ANYWAY - and so guardianship or guidance is for those willing to learn to swim rather than isolate within 'protection' from changes that are felt dangerous or threatening. A false kind of protection is costing the Earth - and on an individual level costs a true appreciation of Everything while we are alive.

Instead of seeing the world crash and burn - take a crash course in self-knowledge. The only difference is a willingness in place of cursing and damning. Regardless such behaviour can be presented as if rational or as if wise.

What is hidden is not just our fears and sense of lack or guilt - but the true movement of our being. Think like the fairy tale; the true love is protected by terrors. Therefore something has to truly MOVE you to move past the boundaries set upon your consciousness by a negative conditioning loop. That calls for a cease and desist of the false in some moment of willingness for true. The fruits, grow the shoots by illuminating a different pathway than define, divide and control. Because it is different, the mind of the old paradigm cannot and will never - see it. But what is left unused fades, while what we appreciate, appreciates (grows).

We are obliged to grow a different mind by acting from a fresh 'take' instead of subconsciously persisting a mis-take. No one else can accept for another's willingness - but we can extend faith in another's capacity to choose by honouring this instead of seeking to manipulate them to align our own private agenda - (regardless the good intentions).

Labelling something is not a diagnosis or cure - but rather a way to package and normalize a dissonance calling for attention. This reminds me of disk software that maps out bad blocks - ie: just don't go there! It is also the basis of a fraudulent medical paradigm.

The matrix mind is wrapped in multiple complex layers of wrappings that all share the intent NOT to know - and in this purpose it works very effectively - while seeming to be busy managing the every more complex and insane symptoms as if realities in themselves.

But twilight as the crack or cusp between worlds - is a bleedthrough portal for consciousness denied by the mapped out definitions of daylight focus - so observing an increasingly fake and crazy world can only stir the deeper currents of an otherwise discarded or denied consciousness.

- - -

I honour your feelings as part of you. I responded as a noticing of the way mind operates - not yours in particular but the mental-emotional patterning that MAKE the 'parallel world' we say we do not prefer - yet persist in unconsciously or subconsciously generating.

A self-protective gut reaction can still express via a partial or mistaken sense of self - so fear of loss can and does drive a world of war and lies. Who sees the breakdown of what at least seemed sane without meeting a fear of loss?

I don't have an issue with that we feel - as we feel - but how we interpret and act as a result. Mind-manipulation is not just applied externally - it's built in as an invested identity. You took personally what is not addressed or intended to deny or invalidate your feeling of being you. Blame is a fake currency of exchange as far as I am concerned so I also don't go out of my way to protect you from your feelings - which are valid feedback for you - no matter what is actually being believed and experienced.

A sense of a 'fake' or shifting reality is the basis of the curiosity as to what truly is. That is my interest; opening the curiosity as to what is going on - and especially what is going on in the mind of the perceiver - because that is where I see the deceiver or manipulator emanating from  and I state that without implying guilt. For if I am in some measure participating in my own suffering, I am no longer powerless under any kind of 'Caesar-driven' (parallel world) in which hate sacrifices love to preserve its self-specialness.

No offence is intended. Feeling what we truly feel is the only way to uncover what we actually believe... and be free to change it.

Saturday, 1 April 2017

Fake masking and mind as creative

Spiritual-Bypassing-Ten-completely-B-S-practices-of-supposedly-spiritual-people

The above inspired my comment:


The 'ego' hides in pointing out the fault in others - and in this case in forms of  'spirituality being used as a mask'.


The form is not the reality - but the meanings you accept, you give.
Assigning or associating forms with meanings is fantasy interposed over what is.

That forms of mutually agreed definitions are used to mask in so as to keep secret, and mask out so as to protect a fake narrative reality against true, is simply observable. The invitation to focus exclusively on errors as if escaped or judging over them - is the playing of the game of separation in place of the healing or undoing of the error.

Mistakes are inherent to learning. When new perspective opens - an old sense of self as un-owned habit - will at some point attempt to reassert the new wine in its old bottles. This will operate every kind of egoic mind-trickery that is now more open to noticing. Noticing the 'default' choices of past learning AS choices is the awakening freedom to choose or align in the presence of a true acceptance. So in this sense the 'errors' are not the source and means of blame and penalty - but the breadcrumb trail to an expanded and embracing awareness - in freedom to focus within a true sense of worth or integrity in place of attempting to force a false sense of self in struggle.

When communications are employing the name and blame and shame modality - they are invitations to play self-superiority and self-righteous hate under the mask of seeming to be correcting the error in others. But the ONLY way to correct an error in another is to correct OUR perception of them. For unless we first accept correction for ourselves - self-rejections go forth to find their target in every justification for the withdrawal from and withholding of love. Love is not what you DO - but what you ARE - when nothing is taken away (judged and rejected) and nothing added (narrative overlay of self-inflation).
The capacity to accept love for your self is the extension of worth and recognition of love in the one who seemed 'other'.

Love is simply being - but what the mind in egocentricity has made of love is fearful indeed. Fear of love is replacement of self with a stranger - by which a world of strangers arose. Fear of love is an evasion of intimacy that acts out in forms of separation, distance and delay, so as to focus in an exclusive sense of split-off self. And a love-hate alloy of polarised self-experience that is all based on conditional or 'special' love. To make special is to separate from - not in truth - but in wish.

You CANNOT bypass your true being indefinitely - for pain has limits to tolerance. When the game is no longer felt as 'worth the candle', it fades from even the seeming of meaning - and the stirring of the desire to embody meaning finds movement in conscious awareness as the noticing of recognition amidst the mind and world such as to shift or align toward reintegrating to what and who you simply - and always already are - which is a relational field AND its embodiment in thought and form. But don't take my words or any words, for your recognition.

- - -
(On the same page)

forestkitty said (to the article):
everything you need is right inside of you. it is how you project it that counts.

My comment:

Yes, as need-lack or wholeness of an unfolding need-fulfilment. True desire is connected movement of being. Not a state of lack or disconnection.
Projection of need-lacks 'makes a world' of separation, struggle and loss.
But true need recognized at source is already a true movement in being - and abiding as and in alignment with true being releases the 'mind' of lack to recognition of living presence in act or flow.

The mind cannot NOT project the thought accepted there - so the nature and the quality of the thought we accept is either aligned with our true signature vibration or not. Taking in or taking on who we are not is part of the human experience - as part of entering and attuning to a world in which to participate and share in. Yet the developed ability to learn a world of separation and lack is the forgetting of our true being - until - the mask of the personality becomes too tight, painful or joylessly meaningless to WANT - and then the rewakening to the true of you rises through the seeming breakdown of what you are not.

Releasing what doesn't work LETS in to that which does. But while a sense of lack seems to bring me a pay-off - it will be protected for what it 'gets'. As I recognize what doesn't work CANNOT work, the 'pay-off' becomes irreversibly associated with futility and suffering - that I know I do not want - and so find willingness to truly look at and let go the persistence of.

We can always and only meet 'where' we are coming FROM, and so in true and in false the Law applies equally - that can be said as 'what you give out is what you get back', or 'As ye sow, so SHALL ye reap', (shall being a present choice and not a future tense).
Determining to see worth in another counteracts the habit of seeing what is wrong with everyone. It may seem 'unrealistic' or denial of reality - but it is changing the projection and the frequency of one's thought. True vision is always a gift - and so the willingness to see a different world (than fear made) is not the forcing upon it of a 'nice' version.

The sickness of a world fear made needs to be felt to allow it to be challenged. But projecting blame hides the feelings as 'at the hand of another' in a sense of victimhood and powerlessness. Collapsing blame upon oneself is no different in error but horrible and hateful to experience, so the thoughts of guilt - are the dissonances to be truly looked at and questioned.

Freedom from guilt is the gift of our true being - that moves through us to others and reflects a world of a different order.
What I wrote here arose as a meditation upon your sharing - so I thank you.

Friday, 31 March 2017

Belief in helplessness



While relating to a specific point in a current narrative spin the off-guardian article on the nature of the 'Russian hacking' investigation - the issues that I see underneath the specifics are addressed below:


Belief in helplessness or indeed asserted fear of powerlessness is a foundation-belief to the human conditioning. A sense of lack seeks to cover and inflate itself as if to guarantee and justify its assertion of identity. It seeks to take or get what it feels denied or deprived of by the 'enemy' - that is this life cast in is envy, fear and hatred seeming justified.

"Frantic and loud and strong the dark ones seem to be. Yet they know not their enemy, except they hate him. In hatred they have come together but have not joined each other. For had they done so, hatred would be impossible. The army of the powerless must be disbanded in the presence of strength. Those who are strong are never treacherous because they have no need to dream of power and to act out their dream. How would an army act in dreams? Any way at all. It could be seen attacking anyone with anything. Dreams have no reason in them. A flower turns into a poisoned spear, a child becomes a giant, and a mouse roars like a lion. And love is turned to hate as easily. This is no army, but a madhouse. What seems to be a planned attack is bedlam.

The army of the powerless is weak indeed. It has no weapons, and it has no enemy. Yes, it can overrun the world and seek an enemy. But it can never find what is not there. Yes, it can dream it found an enemy, but this will shift even as it attacks, so that it runs at once to find another and never comes to rest in victory. And as it runs, it turns against itself, thinking it caught a glimpse of the great enemy which always eludes its murderous attack by turning into something else. How treacherous does this enemy appear, who changes so it is impossible even to recognize him!

Yet hate must have a target. There can be no faith in sin without an enemy".
 (~ACIM)
You can read the section I quoted from at:
http://www.jcim.net/acim_us/TxtChap-21-8.php

As the stark insanity reveals itself obvious, Reason either awakens or hate and fear dedicate to yet deeper dissociation and fragmentation.

The need for the belief in the 'enemy' is not confined to the article's 'experts' - who can as easily themselves be cast as liars operating evil agenda of the 'Enemy'. If the true 'enemy' is a faulty formulation of reality - then the correction is not in the effects or symptoms of that faulty formulation. However, the identification within adaptation to a world predicated on error, is heavily defended AGAINST exposure - above all else.

Everything is sacrificed to the survival of such a sense of self. And the mind operates the justifying narrative to hide and cover such a self-betrayal. The breakdown of the narrative mind can expose the raw awareness of a deeper need than conflicted self makes symptom of, and this is the heal the conflict - or correct the error - where it is - and not out on the world of 'other'.

Regardless where hate and fear drive us to assign 'enemy' - all such operates the allegiance to the belief and faith in 'anti-life', and its magnification as the driven narrative of subjection or hollow and pyrrhic 'victories'.

"Do I desire a world I rule instead of one which rules me?". (ACIM)
Such is a true sovereignty of being - for what you accept true of you IS your received experience - and your gift to the whole. Polarities are embraced by their true context. Problems have to be seen from a perspective beyond or outside their framing, to be truly resolved. The re-packaging and re-distribution of problems, is the business of self-evasion - not progress.

When the 'guardian or protector' becomes an insane prison guard, is it not time to release their employ?



Sunday, 26 February 2017

Existence, History and Culture

A thought on Culture as an Integral Part of the Conditions of Existence
by Norman Pilon
- - -

My Comment to the theme:

One need not understand how life works to align in its movement and know the fruits thereof.
Indeed the attempt to understand life, may be usurped by the mind of define and control - upon a life, a world, a relationship - unseen, unfelt and unshared. Understanding in the heart does not deny or exclude the use of the understandings of the head, but knows itself an integrative movement of thought and feeling - and not a coercion operating the deceit of control over a denied sense of subjection - for the true of such being is invalidated, deprived, used, discarded, suppressed, denied.

I feel the nature of our conflict and suffering , arises from false currency accepted, identified and defended as true - and reinforced by acting forth from mutually held definitions of unconscious, subconscious and so-called waking or surface conscious assertions and defences. What we made  - knowingly or not - is made upon (and depends on) that which truly moves us. The substitution of a truly felt life for a mind in story is to trade sovereignty of being for subjection under fear and division under the belief one is getting something better or that without one will be lesser, and so is getting away from something worse, in fear or belief of greater pain or loss. The conditioned and conditioning identity of getting, overlays and substitutes for what in words I can only call receiving and giving - which is the gift of the current through the focus or choice of our recognition of living in its terms... or getting in terms of a segregating self sense.

What happens is always only current. Even to say Now is to separate or collapse to a focus within an imaged reality. A seemingly possessed reality.
Happening is a totality, an instant, a knowing or wholeness prior to mind. To feel and know this is to release investment in a sense of possession or identity in getting - and fear of loss. Because life is never somewhere else - excepting to the mind that takes the bait of believing it has become something else and has such power - and suffers in the measure of its own making.

To make story is to subject Current... to a framing mind of accepted meanings, and open the consciousness of subjective differentiation.
This sense of self existence is the thought-feeling-knowing "I am". This is the First - unqualified acceptance and expression of self-awareness. Prior to time and space that operate within unfolding Idea-experience of the qualities of being. And beneath the coverings of conditionings arising from a sense of betrayal and loss of such intimacy of experience to a mind-capture that seems instead a subjection to unchallengable external power.

What happenED is story that arose as a getting and fear-conditioned pattern.
The living current is represented by currency of symbol, imagery and concept as a 'short-cut' to the actual intimacy of true currency. And the identification of love and self with what we thus make is like unto a cuckoo concept that kicks our true creations out of the nest. Our life functions become aligned to serve a parasitic, destructive - or un-creative deadness that grows self-illusion upon the living relations we no longer have time or permission or consciousness to recognize, live and share in as the knowing and being of our living.

Conditioning substitutes for living response and response-ability. A mechanism imposed upon life constructed by disconnect-thinking that would give it life in its own image. That would posses by consumption, domination, and usurpation, that which it feels denied and deprived of by a sense of life unworthy and treacherous, and which is thus defended against with rage and defiance to the very last.

The story can take every and any forms, and yet the core content is the same in all. Yet the story of self-struggle over and against a sense of loss is history-defined. And where history carries the charge of betrayal, rejection, abandonment and denial - its imposition upon the Current is the re-enactment of the past in terms of retribution and vengeance. History but repeats the original separation patterns of experience in ever new clothes. But at what point is the futility and fruitlessness of using life thus - and being so used - unavoidable?

Perception is selective. You see what you want to see and disregard the rest. That this happens so fast your 'waking mind' is unaware of its operation is part of the defence that made the masking off of what merits focus or disregard. Yet this reveals what we are believing to choose to see and experience as we do - and in reclaiming this awareness we can re-evaluate if it is true of who we Currently accept and feel and know to be. When formerly unconscious framing thought is released - a fresh perspective opens as a greater participation in the true Currency of life. Life more abundant - in terms of integrative aligning of self, and world in life. Ideas or core beliefs in fear and lack are no less abundant in their fruits - but are not recognized as fruits - but insults and failure amidst an abundance of fear and lack.

Everything I write is toward reclaiming - or being found - in true foundation that naturally aligns thought and feeling from which natural responsibility follows and indeed flows one with.
"The more acceptance that technology gets, the harder it is to change. If enough people are stuck at the same level, they think it's the truth." ~ (Bjarne Stroustrup).
I rephrase the above quote as the more acceptance the mind of defining, predicting and controlling life is given, the harder it seems to challenge it. If conditioning sticks, its symptoms or effects are accepted as the human condition.

In a love hate mind and world, everything is an alloy - and yet a willingness to know does not have to be perfect to align in and receive of what Is to be known and the desire to change a poor experience for a better one has roots deeper than a manipulating mind seeks to re-frame and harness for its own attempt to get for itself from what others are willing to give away - if tricked and conditioned to do so.

When the model or construct of self and reality - for these are two sides of one Current Event - no longer serves purpose - and operates destructively as a sacrifice of purpose to a fantasy played out upon a mechanical 'life' - then all basis for thought and be-life has to be redeemed in true Currency - as willingness allows and accepts.

It is conceptual - image or idol based thought that divides and rules out Sanity - in the self-illusion of ruling over. But its acceptance as true is its righteous defence against being challenged or exposed as a narrative control wearing the masks of power, prestige, learning, and any other culturally institutionalized idol.

To demonize the mask is to be baited and diverted by the mask - and so in that way the mask of life operates the denial of the living - while claiming righteousness against the perceived wrong of the other. Indeed even suggesting the disengagement from the mask is to trigger all sides of every conflict to reject, attack and invalidate the common 'threat' - because the masking belief is the identity of power and protection - without which is the belief reality will reject, attack and invalidate.

The nature of receiving/giving is made obscure by belief in the value of getting. But the measure we set in our giving is the only limit on our receiving. Everything else is a trick in the mind - but surely, you have noted, the mind is not the tiny thing that thinking has made it seem - and suffer real.