Monday, 16 February 2015

Selling your faeces? No shit!

Why celebrities might start selling their faeces
On evidence of inheriting characteristics from the donor, the market moves to open the bowel?

In the book; The Heart's Code, a wide variety of information is presented - albeit in a casual format, that includes many compelling witness to aspects of consciousness being inherited by donors. The heart is not 'just' a pump - much as some disconnect-minded scientist wish it be true. Now there is more and more evidence that the gut is a much more important function to the health of the whole - including brain function - and is also imbued with the resonance of the consciousness of its donor.
However, the idea of getting qualities from others is not new. The bath-oiled skin scrapings from renowned Roman soldiers fetched a good price in it's day. And also from the qualities in nature. However, one must match the quality in another to carry and be it oneself. In the case of a donor, there is a willingness of relating - of opening. Even sex opens our psychic being to qualities of 'otherness' that we may integrate and blend or reject and suffer. Seeking to get from others what one does not believe to exist in one's self, is the transaction of a scam. Receiving in gratitude for help that one consciously asks for and accepts operates an inbuilt safety - because only honour and gratitude is given to the one who gives freely - no strings attached.
Fear not the Gift of Life and be vigilant against the scam that promises to add to a sense of un-worth - as if to validate it. Doesn't work that way. Never will.

No Big Bang

One of many articles positing Big Bang may not be demanded by alternate model of Universe:

Big Bang Didn't Happen? New Theory Suggests Universe Has No Beginning, No End

The model is 'all in the mind' - albeit in broad mutual agreement. I am in no doubt that Reality is Mind and that any holographic microcosm of Mind can yield or release its personal identification investment in mutual definitions and know - and I say know - Existence with no shadow of doubt or interference of any kind. But One - any one cannot share or give or communicate any facet OF Existence but through some degree of self definition in relation to the aspect of Existence that is moving as the focus of current desire. However, self-definition is not necessarily exclusive and indeed is free to shift perspective - infinitely. A Universe of Living Information or Communication that extends the Time-less Infinite as Idea is not 'inside anyone's skull'. But materialism diminishes Consciousness almost to want to render it obsolete - excepting as a leverage of technologism that in fact turns out to be directed by a private personal agenda after all. This is evident in cultural, social and political thought and consequent behaviour.

It really is a matter of perspective. But the mind of 'command and control' has science derailed from its desire to uncover truth into a presumed neutral and verifiable determination of truth. But all of it is model which may serve some purposes and hinder others.

The alarm bell for a scientist or seeker of truth in any kind of approach is the symptoms that reveal a biased agenda. When science identifies institutionally it has an ego and can be seen to operate a self protectionism of the establishment. Believing neednt be a weak attempt to hold something true to ward off self doubts. For by belief is experience of had. The key - I feel to offer, is to stand in one's belief as one's presence extending as willingness to relate or communicate as part of an ever new appreciation. The belief is a decision in consciousness that operates more as a navigational pathway or channel of communication than as a shield or sword.

But the core Idea of violence as Creation is deeply embedded into the traumatised collective human consciousness and colours everything until it is observed instead of running a program unnoticed. The Idea of no time or timelessness - from which and in which EVERYTHING that is, is and is known to be in the Mind that it is OF, offers a release from the limiting, splitting, warring, mentality that has characterised the human condition for millennia and yet is a conditionING that can be observed and released for a more joy-aligned choice. This is not anti-science for joy is also our genius or more aptly, a channel through which Life Shares Meaning. Of course one can turn one's back on joy and make sacrifice of consciousness, the 'creation' of a self-sense in its own power, but never free of grievance and vengeance no matter how one used magic and rationality to present otherwise.

So busy looking out because of fear that within is an invalidation of self. Its a kind of scam. But one has to extend a true worth to regain one's own and that cant come from a wishful or fearful foundation.

To this line in a comment to the article:

“Science has become polluted with emotion and politics.
We will pay a price for it.”

That elicited my reply:

I had an emotional response to this site deleting my longer reply to yours.  But a coercive hidden agenda operates through notions of purity just as through notions of rationality or indeed the wishful and gullible self-seeking for protection. The price of being out of true is lack of peace, grievance, limitation, struggle and suffering one's projections as if they are actually 'out there'. I do feel the 'church' of scientism is in bed with corporate and financial technologism and that it is a racket.

THIS COMMENT was from Rick to the article - not to me

Albert Einstein was a self centered, egotistic man who received credit for a lot of work he never did. In fact, his entire thesis or theory of General Relativity isn't necessary to describe how this universe works, because most of his work is entirely based on the Laws of Thermodynamics, force, and motion, and he never gave credit to Sir Isaac Newton.

My reply is to Rick's comment:

But he has been iconized and is now embedded in a directed 'history' that most everyone presumes to be genuine currency - and once people think they know and like what they think they know - they don't want to know. But not everyone, so thanks for your comment. We are all containing an ego-centric aspect that can often disguise itself in terms of respectability or acceptability. I don't feel to invalidate a human being as if to validate myself - NOT that I see you doing that - but it so often happens that we like to be right about the wrong we see exclusively or predominately in another. As I do not originate myself I cannot have an original thought - but I can extend a willingness for communication that does not mask a hidden agenda - to the best of my current ability. Passing off as something one is not is an expression of ego substitution for a genuine life. But in making mistakes we CAN become aware of poor choices and so come to better ones.

Rick came back to me:

I don't feel a person needs to invalidate another to advance an agenda either. The fact is he was ego-centric and self centered as his relationship with his wife and children clearly shows. In so far as the rest. The fact is Newton's Laws of Thermodynamics are all that is necessary to create and demonstrate exactly how our universal model functions, and also disproves Einstein's theory of General Relativity.

In conversation with Rick:

Societal norms brought out the egotist in many males in many ways. There is a dance between the individual and their conditioning that often fails to transcend it.
I don't know about your assertion on Newton. What's your take on WHY or HOW the establishment embraced and reformed around Einstein's passing off? (If it is clearly not true, what function is it serving?)

Does the subatomic 'Universe' fit the Newtonian model? I think not. If there is a clear benefit, then a perspective has that much validity for the beneficiary at least. However reputation without substance may seem a benefit but actually operates a disintegrity. So true is a matter of self-honesty. Without such foundation - there IS no foundation!


This article is preparing the population for the legalising of cannabis - perhaps in ways that serve global corporate agenda which usually operates a negative consolidation of power and wealth.

Super strong cannabis responsible for quarter of new psychosis cases
Risk of developing psychosis up to five times greater for those who smoke 'skunk' cannabis every day

If a recreational drug is used as an enhancement rather than a replacement for social or creative activity then it is not being used to serve an agenda of escaping fear in such a direct way (allowing that social activity itself can be used as an escape from unfaced fears).

But when the desire is to 'get completely out of one's head' in a way that peers may reinforce as a positive or self-loving act - then it generally 'wears off' so as to require increasing dosage or potency. And so for those who normalise to such dosage, there seems to be no issue.

However, running away from fear - whether via drugs, workaholism, or any other kind of identity forming conditioning, can ONLY result in reinforcing the fear that the act of running away ITSELF, validates. To be dissonant, wilful, defended and reactive is the state that then is magnified and reflected as one's experience and this spiral either brings one to wake up from self-harm to a self-valuing or to various forms of collapse and dysfunction.

The world as we perceive and communicate it feeds the desire to escape or defend or deny, because in significant sense we are all 'running away from unfaced fear' and this is resulting in waking or collapse and dysfunction.

IF you included alcohol as part of your family and social recreational life, would you want the strongest option to be the one your aspiring children are introduced to. It isn't as simple as that because it is not just the potency. There are particular harmonics of effect to a 'high' and all dope is not the same but simply weaker or stronger.

Generally I believe one is well served to avoid processed foods and substances and to prefer the natural original living plant that has grown with the minimum of adulteration or contamination as a result of agendas that are not about fulfilling service, but manipulating outcomes.

It is unsurprising that a manipulative consciousness attracts manipulators.

Consciousness Itself is a wholeness of being and opening this realisation will naturally release outer dependencies in favour of a 'cup that runneth over'. Joy is our true nature and desire but we have a 'funny way of defining that circa 2015.

Of course, subject to consequences, one is free to do whatever one chooses. There are ALWAYS consequences. Living from a fear-defined sense of self will 'OUT' itself - but the messenger is not the message.

Attacks on the person and displacement of our true living responsibility onto external agencies is the way we ARE tending to define our joy. One might say that something stinks in this - but peer pressure may redefine the stink to be this scapegoat or that scapegoat and indeed war about it so as to be successfully distracted from the stink.

This is just my reflection. Test everything you read for what resonates to your heart's truth. I don't seek to persuade. We are each uncovering our own life - and yet together share it, positively or negatively. Fear denies true choice and so sooner or late one has to choose not to use it to hide in - or from. In one's own timing.

What Is real and what is illusion?

Disappointment expressed:

Denmark’s chief rabbi has this to say about Benjamin Netanyahu

It might appear that Jews are 'operated' by their own 'intelligentsia'. But what do I know about manipulating perception, identity, loyalties and outcomes through the use of fear? Anyone or any group hungry for power over others uses any and every kind of device because they believe such power is the only reality apart from its due worship. Almost everyone uses this capacity to coerce outcome rather than uncover an honourable one for all concerned because in everyone is the capacity to believe their self, or ideology or nation or cause or point of view, is THE TRUE AND RIGHTFUL DOMINION and thus others or other perspectives are invalid.
The way to actually strengthen our own faith is to give the freedom to the other that we desire to enjoy ourself. This insults self-specialness of any kind and thus is less popular and less likely to be newsworthy.
So I feel for the way that is not baited or sucked into hating and invalidating 'other' even when the choice being made is meaningless and destructive to my own discernment of true being. But to reflect of communicate THAT such choices are bing made serves the capacity of all involved to choose rather than be manipulated into what they take to be their 'choice'.
We all take joy and love the freedom to enjoy life - but we each define ourselves and therefore our joy in ways that we are mostly unaware. One of the potential fruits of tragic pain is to a deeper honesty that opens perspective upon what might be called our core self deceptions - that others who study psychology as simply a way to gain power rather than illuminate healing, take advantage of.
If your PC is part of a botnet, becoming aware of it is the call to clear out files or programs that are illegitimate and do not belong - nor serve you - whatever the carrot or stick that might be part of their acceptance or persistence.
Thankyou for your attention.