Friday, 21 November 2014

Driverless cars

Driverless cars are liable to being stolen and used in terrorist attacks, report warns

Driverless minds have long been hacked and manipulated by private agendas and fear is indeed the principality behind such adulteration and usurpation of an honest, just or true communication.
Botnets of unattended driverless consciousness are fed the story they are free, so that the wielder of deception can feed on them.
But first they must enact this within and upon themselves or they would be immune
Who has no ears to hear - let them herd!

Thursday, 20 November 2014

Globalism - What good is it?

Globalism - What good is it?

Coercive power divides to consolidate and so there is an inevitable 'globalism' when technologies dissolve the limitations that localized coercive power and held it in check as part of a greater communication.
The opportunity that a coercive mentality 'sees' in expanding and opening global markets and in emergent technological usurping of established relationships and services all automatically operates as a negative agenda of the consolidation of coercive power in ever fewer hands. Within such agenda is the parental role of the those in the establishment who assume the right and duty to rule those who demonstrate an incapacity to self-governance. There is a role for parental oversight and guidance but insofar as it operates a coercive identity it serves a divisive and segregating agenda.

Trade and war have been vehicles of cultural communication despite often being rapacious, and genocidal. Trade operates a communication and exchange of needs and values and as such is like unto healthy cell function in the body. But cartel and racket of identity in power operates to make induce abundances and scarcities in such a way as to deprive the cell of its connection to the whole and thus function within an artificially induced isolated individualism. This replicates the programming of the mentality of scarcity and disconnection through out the body so as to reconfigure it much as a parasite reconfigures the neural and immunological networks of its host to serve the usurping agenda.

True power is not coercively asserted upon relations nor coercively maintained to prevent true relations being restored. It is properly a quality and capacity of communication that aligns true fulfilment.

A mind at war within itself may struggle to integrate one aspect over another or multiple aspects within one - but it is never truly unifying or unifiable - for it ONLY unites in alliance to separate never to release the mind of war by which all such separation seems real.

But just as the body will heal if not prevented or disabled from doing so - so is there a reintegrating movement to our Consciousness that - beneath the overlay of war IS Unified Indivisible and Pure EXPERIENCE itself. And not a separate god thinking a separate world to lord it over in jealousy of any other power.

The opportunity for the willingness for reintegration is diametrically opposite to that of the need to GET for itself alone. It also operates automatically as an integrative and healing perspective - but being integrative is not at war with itself nor coercive upon itself in order to be all that it is as a communication within the mind that thinks itself many and at war.

The ideas that are manifesting are those that are accepted true and given identity and belief. This is always so. A Global identity can mean a global imposition of coercively dictated identification and it can mean an awakening humanity to its true nature in the shaking off of a parasitic kind of thinking that does NOT belong and has no place in us.

The nature of a truly free will indicates we wake up in the world we choose to be in. And the nature of a hidden agenda is to operate subconsciously within appearances for private gain. Everything we think and say and do is part of choosing the world we want to be experiencing. Using relationships to assert private fantasy upon may be within one's freedom to accept, but it will not one's freedom reflect.

Just because human beings agree to make fantasy currency, does not establish that it connects to true value. Forgery is a mind-game long before the idea 'money'. But when the whole market is full of manipulators, be sure no one will blow the whistle - and such as do, will be ignored - or rather filtered out or distorted by the lens of a fearfully driven identity.

Response #1 (See page comments if you want the commenters post)

It does not work to project your current consciousness  into other consciousness cultures. The tribe IS the family and ones self and meaning and fulfilment were felt, known and shared AS family.
The devolving of humanity has been operational for a long time now and the psyche operating such dissociation from true belonging does indeed evolve ever more complex rationalisations to support itself and deny its true condition - that is its original nature and the true condition of its split and conflicted nature. It does so by projecting upon a world in order to dis-own itself and excommunicate what it elects to hate and differentiate from what it cannot control - which leaves it a private mind associated in a body and with others of like kind. But they are not really out there and external - nor the hated self, they are feeling knowing ones as are you - and so you are family but are blind to each other by virtue of your highly evolved superiority over Life.

That was just from your first statement - Manly Hall's youtube on American Indian culture might be worth a listen.

Uncovering true governance in oneself will extend as right relations with others and grow or reinforce integrative and shared values that support structures in which all can live. The focus on the form is a deceptive denial of the meaning. the meaning is not derived from the form - but the form embodies the meaning - OR deceit is active.
If falling onto our own resources without the protections and prohibitions of the State will activate us to do more than think about things ;-)
In emergence of what is truly needs one soon recognizes what not only does not work but cannot be afforded. If fear mounts on fear - stark insanity breaks out from within - and then manifests without.
One way or another I feel fear - the choice that is fear - is being exposed AS a choice and each will then exercise choice in consciousness of free willingness as to whether they want to repeat another grand cycle - from the dark, or accept the shift to a new paradigm in which fear is no longer hidden or hide-able - and responsibility for consciousness AS conciousness replaces the mask of the persona and its game of powers.
The script will run whatever, but the perspective we choose determines our identification.
The attempt to change the world out from an un-owned fearful projection upon the world is an insanity and a futility.
History is not a dustbin. Everything passes. But its trace and connection to and from our current perspective is also a cultural choice or indeed a fear directed manipulation.
It is possible for the choice to deny choice to retrograde consciousness into very dense contraction and disconnection for light. But just because something is possible does not mean we resonate with it or find it in any sense a meaningful choice. But you know that pain can call intensely for darkness - in delusion that hiding is escape. Exposure of the meaninglessness in light witnesses evaporation. Fear does not know who you are - how can it protect you but in persisting to knot know or be known truly. Without its government all will be chaos! it screams. Let it scream. No one HAS to answer that phone call.

Response #2 (See page comments if you want the commenters post)

 What is to smash - an idea? I believe the vocabulary of the cult you seek to point out uses terms like smash.

If you find the established or old paradigm operates a model that costs so much more complexity of confusion, conflict and fear to maintain and support, than it offers in true service to life, then grow the new one.

In a nutshell, the state is an idea that manifests an institution that acquires a sense of its own existence or ego-centric distortion. The guardian becomes a guard, the protector a jailer, the communication device a block to communication.

The only ideas that will manifest are those that find acceptance and allegiance of recognition and value.

A coercive sense of self-existence seeks to determine these ideas to support its own private agendas - be they personal or corporately operating.

Thus communication itself has been usurped by war to convince, trick or persuade others what the perpetrator WANTS to be accepted true by others - for whatever reasons consciously held or unconsciously active.

A new paradigm is what is being recognized and shared and embodied as true value - rather than reactive or negatively defined reactions to an unwanted value.

Much as the warriors of grievance and frustration refuse to accept - this has to begin within oneself. Not as a thinking exercise of shifting the furniture around, but in the manner of a breakdown/breakthrough that is cooperatively embraced or perhaps passes through periods of deep unsettling - because it is our reality that is 'broken' - not the truth of whatever it is that we truly are - but our beliefs, thoughts and concepts that define our self - and therefore operate a model by which we see and share the world.

The state or cult that I seek to identify as the template that needs renewal and alignment is the cult of the identity of a command and control mentality. A fearful and fear inducing coercive and deceptive mentality. It can be seen as pervasive to every area of our life - because it is a false foundation.

The idea of coercing the coercion out of existence is simply a play within persistence. There is no way of fighting it to win because it is the very idea of fighting for something and will be fed by whatever side of whatever fight. Standing in one's integrity may look like fighting - but the key is being positively integrative. Siding with our inherent integrity and freedom is siding with all but refusing the bait of that which disintegrates and tyrannizes.

It is no surprise that 'the shadow power' owns the resistance as well as the state. it basically owns anything that becomes significant to its agenda - enough to make sure its interests are served in ways that keep it in shadow.

The mask can seem appealing or threatening but underneath is nothing anyone would choose, who had any capacity to choose. So the mask is also that which effectively denies the awareness of the capacity to freely choose. Another name for mask is persona. The netbot and spambot idea offers a sense of millions of infected PCs being wielded by shadow power. I propose that the antivirus software in our mind is in fact operating as a back door for shadow power to operate remotely and configure our own minds for its agenda. I am talking of 'fear'.

As long as individuals choose to propagate and support a cult of fear, true cultural renewal and expression will be undermined. The desire to 'make the really bad feelings go away' calls on any and every kind of deceit - including giving power to the State or to experts or rationalism or religion of any kind of ideology whatsoever.

Notice now that the institutions or ideas that WERE operative in keeping fear hidden or keeping us hidden in fear are breaking down. That is the end of the old paradigm - there is no persisting in it except perhaps an adventure in an even deeper descent into fear than we have yet imagined - and I say we are deeply down that rabbit hole already - as far as our identity of conditioned mind is concerned.

Fear is a mixture of self-conflicting elements that have no basis in truth - but only in reactive interplay in which an enemy is essential for maintaining such identity - what identity? Command and control. The wish for power. Pluck out the sin of our own mind and then see your world, your fellow man and the choices he makes and suffers as if done unto him.

All warriors of the grievance unite in denying the man of peace - because they cannot find support from him or a way to subvert or co-opt his will - simply because it is not in conflict with itself.

It is not true that Jesus was special or that the story of Jesus is serving a specialness that was irrelevant to any other human being with a willingness to listen. Fear has made a mask over it so as to neutralize its meaning - which is simply the meaning of putting aside the will to power - the persona-investment - and uncovering a will that is unconflicted.

the 'second coming' is the recognition of the meaning of our true will beneath the coercive deceptions of a hidden fear  which we took as our own thinking.

True relations embody the culture of a tangibly shared sense of value. Just embody nothing ELSE and you will BE the new paradigm and an unselfconscious ambassador for a joy and integrity of being.

Or persist as a warrior of the grievance, a seeker of vengeance, a captain of the self-righteous or as Pink Floyd once put it; "a lead role in a cage". No one can put you there but you - and whatever else Mandela lived he demonstrated the mind is what imprisons - regardless the outer cage. But who wants freedom who already believes their freedom is reactive and oppositional identity?

Response #2A

Yes what works is what persists - according to the purpose held. When the model breaks down it may attempt more and more extreme attempts to control - yet adding control is what introduces instability into a system - at least in the sense I mean of coercive control. There are innate ways of control that are not fearful intervention but harmonic resonance. One can inspire a concerted effort. But attempting to manipulate a result by faking inspirations is like crying wolf. It soon uses up residual credibility.

I feel perhaps to qualify that Mind Is Free but that 'my mind' is a layer that imposes limitations and constraints - within mutually agreed and reinforced beliefs and definitions.

I find that realignment to true relations, operates a clarification in which what is completely false falls away and what was a confusion of true within false framing is restored to its true status.
If we look at our language, we can immediately see how we give power away.

Whatever else I do when I write or speak or think, I am vigilant for distortions. One starts wherever one is at - but there are ways we use our mind to make it seem limited and then believe our own spin.
Worth remembering that words (idea, definition, belief) SPELL and that our word operates whether we know what we are doing or not.
I'm not advocating political correctness - simply owning what we put out and being willing to stand in it or meet through it. So much that passes off is exactly that - passing off or masking.
If there is a new paradigm arising as the need of our time then it will be through a willingness to live it - in whatever way is our discovered way.
I'm more interested in the integrity of people in relations of shared interest than exactly what structures serve at any given moment. When communication is engaged - which ONLY occurs in freedom everything starts to synchronize and open up. So I feel to point to the blocks to freedom where they CAN be released - which is not really out there though we might use that to invalidate ourselves and not step up to the mark where the next step is waiting to lead us in unexpected directions.
I believe the world we manifest and perceive is directly reflective of the consciousness within of which we are mostly oblivious. But those who 'direct history' know well that ideas and beliefs structure and direct and organise perception and identity. But they are messing from the outside whereas within our mind we really do have a true power of command that is not coercive and divisive but whole.

Coercion victims

Not only are such articles prejudicial to justice, they are operating their own agenda in the guise of caring.
An inquisition may seem totally justified - but what actually runs its agenda?
Trial by media is no trial at all.
The capacity to feed stories into the media may serve no less coercive and deceitful agenda than what is alleged - albeit taking different forms.
The media may feel helpless to being shafted by power lobbies or it may willingly serve them. But who are the victims of such distortion? Ultimately we choose our own perspective - whatever anyone or anything else 'does'. Then is being honest to oneself a way of restoring true perspective rather than giving our power away to blind fear agenda.

To the issue of violation:
For every action is an equal and opposite reaction.

If the power to assert and impose one's fantasy upon the reality of others and of Life, is associated with freedom and fulfilment - then the result must be hollow loss of all that is true in exchange for a lie.
This IS intolerable excepting one finds support in stories of mutual agreement to maintain a sense of self despite it being the expression of a lie.
So energetically, the secret worship of the power to coercively assert fantasy upon true relations, feeds and supports it as  an accepted part of a self belief of 'human nature'. The law then asserts some forms of this as criminal and others are accepted as the basis of corporate power. The 'will to power' is generally checked overt or brute expression but also operates in guile, stealth and deception.
The attempt to get something from others by deceit is so pervasive in human society as to be almost invisible. It is not innocence - for to adopt its mask one must first be deceiving oneself - in the way described above, of setting a wish more precious than true relation within oneself and operation coercion upon one's own being.The forms of such manipulation open to being manipulated and outcomes of masked or secret appetite and agenda may find alliance in a mutually agreeable coercive alliance, or a power struggle in which one will appears to deny and subjugate another.
While 'victory' may provide a 'hit' of power amidst feelings of betrayal, deceit and worthlessness displaced onto others, it actually feeds them and sets up an addictive reinforcement of the conditions that fuel a displaced and masked sense of self-hatred.
Victim-hood is the dancing partner of abuse of power, and in a sense leads the dancer - for a the self that is raised upon grievance is vengeance of a self-hatred fully justified in projecting hate upon another.
This is not the world we truly live in, but is the world we inherit and have all been initiated into and no hatred is so fierce as that of being wronged and feeling fully vindicated in hating.
Personas operate among other things as masks and roles in a complex script of experience that is privately generated but passing off as a world of self-evident realities.
What is actually happening in our unfolding experience of living is not as our various and competing fantasy-assertions would coercively impose upon our consciousness of Life. In fact any attempt to determine truth operates as a coercive attempt to MAKE it so rather than listen and relate.
Any coercive act stems form or is identical to unowned fear - as is our propensity to accept the role it dictates. Thinking alone does not and will not heal or even deliver practical management. For thinking alone is the result of succumbing to a coercive displacement of un-owned fear.
Justice - to be true - must restore our true living appreciation to us and not serve the 'hit' of a dark self satisfaction. Give the mind of vengeance to the "Lord of life", who lords it over none and that how truth is recognized.
Manipulating deceits never appeal to the love that you are - but always to the fear that you are not. Why think alone when you can listen in the heart?

Said a commenter to the article:

I think there's an issue with people mixing up a character being played for the actual person. That and the cult of celebrity. Irrelevant of whether the allegations are true, he has the power, influence and money to suppress them, and has done for many years.

It's not like he'd be the first major celebrity to have this sort of past, and he certainly wouldn't be the first to still be beloved despite smoke billowing out of the personal hut.

To which I replied:

This is no less true in life. You simply are NOT your persona - but likely have an investment in it as if it is YOU - and others may have an investment in using it for outcomes you do not want.

Power of influence - including money is a distorting influence on everyone and everything- unless you do not want it. One does not have to scapegoat a persona for an underlying psychological insight about human consciousness circa 2014.

Love that turns to hate never was love. Love must be able to see beyond the persona to BE love. The surfaces of appearances will serve the wish to hide within them - unless you wake up to see that is not you and you do not want it.. Meanwhile, self-righteous mobs throw stones wherever they are told - and those more integrated in the power of establishment will NOT be called to account - and if some token sacrifice had to be made to redraw the line, it would only be a token sacrifice to buy off the mob - which is easily done for it is ever engaged in the next thing and has no discipline or persistence - as do those who tend to seek and maintain power.
The celeb is a device for manipulating persona as the persona is a device of manipulating perception. But it can serve to communicate your presence without guile or deceit and being celebrated for what one gives and shares is different from an idolatry of what one can get from them or use them for.

Obesity and terrorism

Obesity does more damage to Britain than war or terrorism, study finds

What is the cost of framing such events as if 1 - they are of the same value and 2 - as if money is the measure of cost?
What does anything cost in terms of the peace of our true power to communicate?
However there IS a common element in obesity and terrorism and that is fear.
Un-owned fear operates in secret or unconscious devices so as to perpetuate the illusion of any given deceit to protect one from fear.
Fear drives the appetite to gain and consolidate power as much as to overcome disconnection or abandonment.
The cost of fear being traded as if it was NOT toxic debt mingling with true assets - is that true presence is no longer extended, recognized or shared.
Communication is more than 'warring truths' or feeding endless demand for distraction. It is the natural and uncoercive result of an honest acceptance of one's responsibility to one's own consciousness.
The underlying fears are NOT the foundation from which to live in any sense a true appreciation of living.
The use of fear AS a weapon of coercion or manipulation or of shield to hide in and from, is an insanity that can be corrected. Fear operates a self-fulfilling script. It is not coercive upon us - but is chosen... in a thousand moments every day.
Fear is not God - and Jesus still says "Fear Not". He didn't say 'give me your power and I will protect you from your fears". That is the deceiver which operates in the 'gap' of our lack of presence - whatever form it takes.
Fear costs the embrace and appreciation of true presence, but the deliberate application of fear in the idea; "terrorism", actively seeks to subvert and undermine integrity, and is principally infected in the State and thus the body politic to pursue agenda of power for power's sake in compulsive gluttony of a fear driven deception. Is this when the Prodigal looks up from the trough?

The net gain to the economy of obesity, war and terrorism, is not about GDP - but a very specific subset of corporate agenda that are invested in a mutually reinforcing negatively defined self interest. The principal support for which is the desire to avoid responsibility for consciousness  - again as an expression of a negatively defined self-interest.
To be fearfully defined is to experience disconnection of presence of life in mentally and emotionally segregated sense of power amidst powerlessness. There's no peace in it - and none will ever come from it.
The illusion of power costs everything beautiful, good and true. But ONLY while under its spell. The true power of illusion is in reflective and shared experience. Reflective to the light in which all experience arises. Shared in the qualities of the Timeless. I don't expect those conditioned by fear to understand love - but I witness to that love Is love - and that what fear makes of love is untrue. To stir the spark of remembering in free willingness to forget the forgetting. This can only embrace us where we are now with whatever loves, values and confusions we associate with our self and our experience.
Acceptance opens the awareness to a capacity to observe and be curious and uncover greater perspective of reintegration. Denial dictates terms that must NOT be opened to question - for its reality is assertion and coercion, and its presentation is whatever stories serve to hide the lack of true foundation from exposure.

Tuesday, 18 November 2014

Confusion, grudge and forgiveness

Let it go? Not likely – there’s nothing wrong with holding a grudge

Jennifer Aniston might be preaching forgiveness, but keeping a healthy distance from people who have caused hurt seems perfectly reasonable

Confusion of identity leads to confusion of communication and relationship.

True forgiveness is not a gift to another - but to oneself.

Of course this will extend to others a different version of 'you'.

To love yourself is to let not the past come between you and true appreciation of the Life that both are and share. This may be a process of regaining clarity and releasing baggage, but it supports a discernment of who and where you are in relation to whatever is going on that knows how to be and where to be and NOT be.

A lack of love always seeks to justify itself to others and itself. You do not need a grudge to prefer not to associate with that which does not resonate your true being. Nor is a preference a rejection when you allow the other to be in their own unfolding choices - even if they are not yours.

Political correctness operates a tyranny of rational superficiality - so does 'spiritual correctness'. Rationality divorced from a unified heart and mind is un-Reason and stems FROM grievance. It is hardly the tool to effect your coming back into and appreciation of wholeness.

Listening in the heart is not a superficial insistence of conflicted thinking. Grievance shouts as loud as our willingness to attend it. We can learn a lot about our mind from the events that trigger us to reaction - so as to be more consciously on purpose and less the victim of circumstance.

The sense of personal control does not want to listen to this. But in a greater music a true harmony emerges from playing one's own part truly. This is not coercively appreciated! Be true to you first - and then look out and see others. Otherwise you use what you choose to see in others as the excuse to not live your own life! That is a call for self-forgiveness - or releasing unwanted baggage. Don't put your baggage onto everyone else or you'll 'hate' them all and feel justified, all the while hating yourself unknowing.

Beheading the masculine Denying the feminine

 THis was written into comments for
Allen Jones: The model of misogyny? - which is about an artist whose theme is to focus on images of women in exaggerated or extreme renderings of male fantasy objectification. But the page I wanted to comment into allowed no comment - and that was about the weirdness of a 'beheading' video. So this comment identifies a common underlying thread of manipulative provocation that asserts a distorted perception  and reaction.

- - -

The intent to provoke can serve different agenda. If one wants to provoke horror and outrage so as to manipulate perception, one can - but as others become wise to it one loses all credibility.

In Mass media there is great temptation to use shock tactic to coerce attention and trigger reaction so as to incept a mind-set.

Perhaps the definition of a sucker is someone who WANTS to believe something that is not true.

However, the outcome of anything is determined not by the apparent provocateur, but by the beholder.

Making a god out of qualities of the feminine is a reversal of recognising God in the innocent and intimate appreciation of such qualities.

Parodying a false god can awaken THAT it is a fantasy given power. Once seen, would you not rather open a real relationship? Perhaps the false god will make all your relations drab, tawdry and ugly. This is the nature of focussing on form as the result of withholding your love.

Beheading the mind from the heart leads to disconnected and fragmented fears glossed over with glitter and lipstick.

Denying the feminine castrates the masculine from any real capacity to extend presence and so it pretends power.