Saturday, 27 May 2017

Blame vs Responsibility

After 'meeting' Peter G√łtzsche in inspiring videos on 'dialogue therapy' and then again recently here in a 7m exposure of big pharma as organized crime
I looked him up in a search and alighted in a rebuttal to one of his detractors on David Healy's site.

I commented into this again on blame:


I salute such as David Healy and Peter G√łtzsche - in an inspirational recognition but not as a separating separateness of transference etc.

The one dissonance I felt in Peter's rebuttal is the use of the word 'blame'.
I invite the considering of using the word 'responsibility' - and keeping this in a context of addressing and correcting error rather than guilting. I am not suggesting NOT to prosecute criminal acts.

I wrote on a correction culture rather than a blame culture only an hour ago - when checking out Ben Goldacre's site and following a random link to his article on whistleblowing.

https://willingness-to-listen.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/whistle-blowing-aligned-in-true-witness.html

Attempts to smear, slander and lie in an act of denial and suppression to effectively persist violence or toxicity upon others can bring up feelings of hatred and rage - perhaps mixed with impotence. I believe it is sane to feel what we feel - but not allow a state of reaction to frame our perception until brought to an integration. In this is MY need for healing actively engaged - for vengeance is the nature of hate given justification and I see that that is divisive and conflicting to me - and plays support for those who fear that truth is vengeance rather than healing by the undoing or correcting errors believed real.

Whistle blowing - aligned in true witness

I looked up Ben Goldacre - after a reference to him - and after reading the home page and current article - dropped into a 'random' article on whistleblowers. 

Peep peep.
by Ben Goldacre in bad science, big pharma, whistleblower






My comment:

In a focus of willingness for truth - we create a correction society. (an error correction culture)

In a focus in guilt and blame we have a fear of penalty - and the power struggle to evade, deflect or mitigate it.

Love of truth is characterized by intolerance for self-betrayal.

Fear of true exposure demands masking deceit or persona - that seeks to manipulate or acquire mutual reinforcements as defence against losing face - validity and all that is associated with it.

Fear and blame establish value systems or 'social realities' of exclusion and privilege as part of enforcing compliance as a tacit or contextual conditioning.

These observations are at the root of the human conditioning - which is self-perpetuating or "history repeats itself".

Love of truth is an inner alignment with a felt resonance or quality of coherent being. Truth is its own reward - if accepted as the true foundation for all else.

To have the forms of success or achievement and know its fakery - is sacrifice to the assertion and defence of a lie by which to not know what you know. This calls on ingenious complexity to hide, disguise or falsely attribute - in place of creative freedom of shared discovery.

I have to live with myself as I accept myself to be.
I do not have to give attention and allegiance to a blaming and guilted thinking, that deprives and denies a true sense of connected being. Correction - in an individual sense, is being presently connected and in communication with what is here - in place of dissociated overlay of complex obfusactions.

We operate through personality constructs that are part of learning, adapting and manipulating our world. Bringing this to light not as a sin or a psychological pathology - but as a call for correction - in all involved - is also releasing the power-deceits of scapegoating or invalidating others to seem to be righteous or superior.
Fake reality is all the rage! - but in that wordplay is a serious note - for the suppression and denial of our natural feeling being under the stamp of an unnatural illegitimacy should and does generate terror and rage - where the call for correction is persistently ignored and engineered out of consciousness - leaving nowhere to be. painted into a corner, trapped in thought made flesh by fear-driven belief.

Throwing off or releasing what has no true belonging within us needs a clear accounting - including the willingness to challenge our trojan horse assumptions - for there is the 'best' hiding place - where none think to look because they 'already know' or dare not to look because investment in the model is the power of the day, and the requirements for inclusion and support.

While Reason is synonymous with Sanity - self-justifying rationality can serve insane premises - and generally does.
Discernment is a heart and mind as one. The divorce of heart and mind is a fake emotionality AND a fake rationality. So when I notice that operating in myself - I do not choose to use it as a basis for actions or decisions - to listen , feel and in simple desire be curious for the true or corrected and connected communication or perception - that can take a good step now.
So if fears obstruct the communication or act of true witness - leave blame aside and be curious as to the true nature of the beliefs and assumptions that embody this particular reflection of experience. Keep a channel open for new perspective and insight from which one good step grows another. Wholeness of being is a good of a different order than that assigned to fantasy ideals, or by war against evils that 'attack' or react against the assertion of such. We do not escape symptoms by hiding them in false causes but by uncovering the true - and being a witness or embodiment of its qualities in your relations.

Recognition of true worth grows a culture of worth - even if the outer forms and appearances of disease persist. There is an inner freedom that cannot be described or compared. Whatever else - this is to be in life and truly know it.

Friday, 26 May 2017

Reclaiming Soverignty of Being

What is Needed is a Progressive Vision of National Sovereignty
an article by Thomas Fazi, via Green European Journal
reposted in OffGuardian
where I commented :

 Vaska said:
Most of the European Left seems to have fully adopted and internalized the globalist perspective, so much so that I don’t think there’s a genuine Left left in Europe at all.

Could 'globalist' be replaced by 'technocratic' - which postures as a pseudo scientific 'expertise.
That applied science of technological development effectively 'shrank' our world to one of instant communications, and networks of transportation is the primary enabler of financial and corporate power as a globalism OVER people rather than a global diversity among people.

The undermining of sovereignty of being is the 'alien will' of a wish to be outside, apart from and have dominion over. It is a self-specialness that is necessarily insulted by a life and a world that does not support it. It is the framing of everything in terms that rationalize in order to capture and direct a false identity. For sovereignty in truth is the free and whole will - that cannot have any meaning apart from and over its relations that are one within its being.

The alternate to truth is shifting and warring illusion - where invested identities struggle for light of acceptance and support - as much as to align in judgements of allegiance or rejection. The 'oppositional will' becomes thus negatively defined in what it is not, and by what it fears or is against. There is no free will under tyrannous dictate - but such dictate asserts coercion to be its protection and just vengeance to enshrine hate in the clothing of power and justice.

The idea of consensual dialogue is an idea of willingness - for it it were coercive it would no longer be dialogue but coercion masking as dialogue such as to frame and limit communication in terms of an imposition upon.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction holds true in any action of push or pull upon another - but not of the act of the shift of the whole to adopt a new perspective. So the result of coercive framing or deceit, is an entanglement in fragmented complexities that 'demand' or call forth the necessity of power over feared or perceived chaos.

The more control is asserted, the more chaos of suppressed communication - not recognized AS communication in the form of symptoms needing to be addressed as genuine calls to listen and re-align true. Instead the symptoms are framed as 'causal' or redefined as the nature of reality in terms that support war-economy and sickness farming at expense of the freedom to feel and know and align in the true of the life that moves you. And it is freedom because it is accepted as an integrative recognition and not the frame of guilt and compulsion - however so well disguised.

Regardless how, who and why, the playout or unfolding of the ideas that we accept true and live from unfolds lawfully - in terms of consciousness - but the idea of the subjugation and replacement of consciousness by an alien 'will' (the wish to be other than you are) gives up its true power to an idea of sacrifice or rejection of life in order to get 'more' for itself at expense of others and the whole. Or to 'get even' - or war with - a sense of rejection and denial inherent to engaging in coercion and deceit upon self, other or world - that are really one life fragmented to an incoherence and defended against awareness.

So is the natural desire for our true will being subverted by appeals to an 'old identity' - for the deceit is one up on our recollection when operating as our defences - and is adept at re-framing on the fly so as to preserve narrative continuity regardless of false exposure - while it is wanted as protection and aligned with as power.

I recently heard the phrase 'there is more politics in medicine than there is in politics'. I sense that many here see that politics has been framed in ways that operate a sideshow and mainstream programming device to the actual politic of stamping an organisational conformity and compliance on the face of humanity robbed of (or induced to exchange) its Soul or true feeling awareness of being.

True dialog and being together has a listening or receptive that correlates with 'listening within' rather than acting out a scripted identity triggered by self-inflated gratifications or fearful associations. Yet the latter operates the mind to deny a voice be heard, or a stirring of recognition be allowed, felt and aligned in. Reclaiming our mind - has to pause and desist using the 'old' or accepted thinking, long enough to feel it - discern it - rather than be driven by feelings it encapsulates (which includes the suppression of emotion as it does the manipulations of it).

Without the stirring within - and its acceptance and aligning in - there is nothing but the mechanical playing out of loveless ideas - whose instant of seeming allure fades to reveal a caged hopelessness the guilt of which then hides in some false framed diversion.

The true need - as with all truth - is already moving to its recognition and acceptance and alignment. Any attempt to push or pull from a personal sense of power - is the cage of a personal sense of power - and that is NOT sovereignty of being - but usurpation of a function we don't have and cannot enact.

I write to the stirring within - and not to the development of a personal sense of power to frame and direct life in concept. The territory of our living is not the mapping of models by which to assert power over, but the uncovering of shared purpose in fulfilment of need - which positively defined is unfoldment of true desire as fulfilment of desire. The movement of our being is felt desire that aligns as a focus of attention and intention. The model is a rigid and fixed image and concept that CANNOT relate and respond - except its conditioned reaction dictates to allow.

Sovereignty is not applicable to a collective when the individuals sacrifice to it. But is where we bring our wholeness freely to our relationships and therefore they are holy or whole in the sense of being a true context rather than something to exploit, use, get from or escape and defend against. What is wholeness of being but nothing added and nothing taken away. Come as you are and meet in like kind. But always listening or noticing within for the substitutions of mind.
I used to think I was who I thought I was. In relational honesty I discover myself anew - and yet recognizably so.

Progress must never invalidate any of the steps by which it unfolds a fuller and fresh appreciation of being - or else it embodies the very invalidations it presumes to stand upon in 'victory over'. How could we love or equally embrace all that we are except as the unfolding of an integrative blending of perspective - in place of a segregative of self-specialness that must reject to seem to have existence?

Identity is the point of a phishing ruse - don't accept what is not true of you - but bring curiosity and willingness to what isn't - but yet persists in being enacted or chosen. Instead of one or another form of guilt and deflection. This is the same as saying feel the fears that say 'Stop!' and listen for yourself to see if you want to proceed or to pause and look around. We cannot coerce fear into shape, and have to work with what we actually hold belief for - while growing in the capacity to feel and know our true relational being - to live on purpose and know our purpose as our living. Freewillingly in love of true intimacy of being - instead of sacrificially to get validation for a sense of lack seeking outside itself.

How does any of this translate into our living together or dying apart? However you are truly moved to live. But that is the sticking point because the new wine cannot fit the old paradigm - which insists on defining what and how in terms of an already invalidation of being. I don't know HOW I write or think or feel - it is both a spontaneity and a wholeness. The masking off of a control mentality is killing the life it depends on to pass off as, in order to seem to be real. Yet we do this to ourselves, largely unmindfully - most all the time as we re-enact time to be.

Sovereign being is the heart of wholeness. Imposture is a partiality of a hollowness. The symbol of the sovereign will has been stamped in false currency such as to not know who you really are or what you really want - for all is framed and set in conflicted self and world that we want to escape or prevail over.

Corporate cartel monopoly power is a face-ism over hates and fears kept in the dark - but active beneath the face of regulated protections and services. But a living body is not a corps - so much as a cooperation of all its parts. This is a truth to uncover - even in the play of conflicted and contradictory self-idea.

Thursday, 25 May 2017

The Iron Cage of Hopelessness

Escaping the Iron Cage of Hopelessness
By Edward Curtin


- - -


When 'narrative control' can be recognized as operating 'fake news', it becomes possible to see that the model is fundamentally wrong - and grievously so. Our mind-model taken 'as if' reality can be held to 'as true' only as an act of perpetual war of assertion against truth - excepting filtered distortions that support our identified and believed investment - or such 'truths' as suit us.

In science we say we 'model' reality and theoretically know the difference between them, but investments of energy and attention in identity will not yield to truth and so instead operates the identity in conflict - as if victory over truth is the power to determine it. But all forms of mind-control are variations on the idea of limitation and diminished awareness in which a lie may be bolstered or supported by the sacrifice of life, consciousness and joy in freedom of being. False 'meanings' adulterate, corrupt and usurp inherent Meaning that is our nature and joy to live, give and share in - AS our living - and not as added or painted over 'dead' or fixed self-concept in substitution for life.

That we find ourselves 'painted into a corner' is the work of our own thought - which is given power by being acted from as if true and shared or accepted in mutual currency. In this way we 'create' our reality-experience - but almost completely unconsciously - as a result of limiting and masking off areas of consciousness associated with terror and rage, heartbreak and shame. The narratives of justifications for a gullibility of blind conformity agreements, or the cynicism of an active hatred in refusal to look, mask in seeming scepticism - but without any actual willingness to change our mind - but more to adjust and develop our persona.

Allegiance to the false is the only means by which to persist unaware of true. But while grievance and self-specialness paint the iron cage of hopeless and meaningless futility, a mind suffers as being done unto without any sense of what - at a deeper level - it seeks to 'do' to life in the very structuring of identity in image, in personae and in masked consciousness made out to be reality - period. That is - it is a brief period ending at a full stop. This is an accurate account of a wish held to be true and lived as such. It's inevitable yielding to true is no consequence of sin - but recognition of error as error and true as true. In this is no co-fusion between what has no existence and what has no opposite.

Identity itself is 'deconstructing' in light of exposure and 'reality' is not what it had so solidly seemed. Where we receive identity FROM is a matter of focus in desire and intention. The development of a capacity to hold an automatic or habitual focus in the false and assert it at expense of true is the 'mind, world and abilities' that seem both protector and self - and yet ARE the destructive and divisive thinking that paints the cage of a power it WANTS true and then suffers subjection to.

That which has been designated 'unconscious' rises to conscious awareness - and as the reliving of ancient hatreds - with all the triggered reaction given power to 'run as protection and survival' - in our name. But dissociated entanglements of recycled-conditioning operate the false matrix of a masked reality - where a mind of guilt and pain usurp a simple and honest curiosity. The power built upon hiding and wielding guilt and fear is the seeming power to hold back Life and Truth as if to be a creator in our own right - rather than co-creators in Light.

The former is always a state of conflicted self - no matter how forcefully asserted - and costs the feeling of the awareness of being - of connected presence that is always felt in being yourself - and drowned in the dissonance of the persistence in trying to be (or escape!) something you are not. If something 'rings true' it is no mere emotion-backed mental gratification - but a felt alignment.

The intent to discard Consciousness is not an actuality so much as a wish not to know - as if thereby to 'escape' - but the idea of limitation is made of this - as is the idea of lack from the a tempt to be 'more' in self inflation.

Despair calls on death (and war) to release it - where hope of change allows the idea of changing a mind given to recycling futility. To do only what aligns and resonates true of you, is not a mental exercise - but a desisting of mental engagement in yielding to the true of noticing the mind-in-act.

A negatively predicated identity is set in seeking to avoid what it does NOT want as a seeming positive spin of fear and lack of worth or power. A positively integrating attention is attending wholly in what it DOES want - as a FELT quality of connectedness being lived now.

The mind of the deceiver is not 'THEM' but will operate as such while you want it there. There is nothing new here in that whether we choose to believe untruth is itself hidden from us in the act of doing so. Therefore rewaking to make a different choice is against the force of all that has been learned before - yet not as a forceful opposition of assertive entanglement. ONLY the FELT quality of true connected presence (in whatever forms) will know again or re-cognize the true nature of the choice to align in the true of who you are. But the wretchedness of the pain of the loss of such can and will provide a means to release allegiance to the false.

When false is associated with self-betrayal rather than evil seen in others - the call to vengeance fades to a basis for the desire for truth to grow within us - as a result of yielding the seeming power to usurp our own Source and Nature of being. The 'mind' cannot 'do' this. That is our 'salvation' for only the wish and belief that it can, keeps us chained to its fear and guilt-driven dictate.

The attempt to escape MADE the error real to us. Reliving 'trauma' within a fresh and connected willingness IS releasing it. One doesn't 'DO' something TO it to change it. All the king's horses and all the king's men CANNOT put Humpty together again - but sure as hell will institute death and taxes as the dictate for sacrifice to an idol of power. Did he Fall? Was he pushed? Is it the father of all false flags? How much do we WANT our grievances  and the power in identity they seem to give? How willing are we to overlook and discard a Felt-connecting presence NOW? These two are the same in different form. Some forms of pain seem more 'real' or 'true' than others - and give rise to struggle to get a better place in the cage or make the cage a better place. Freedom is Firstly in being - and naturally extends when accepted there. One cannot escape guilt made real - no matter where it is projected, dumped or redefined as our 'nature' or as  'a viral meme of self-genesis. Guilt is the 'escape' from love's awareness now in the belief you created your own being and have the power to do so.

Steer into the skid - while feeling for true connected traction. We never had the control we took as if our own - and so we never lost it. Phishing cannot 'lose' what it seemed 'nearly' to catch.

Tuesday, 23 May 2017

Healthy brain function

Green Med Info offers depth of information but also magazine trivia - this page on 7 ways to keep your brain young prompted an extra 'tidbit' of possibly useful information - along with comment on the foundations of health - which cannot be apart from life or being as a mere system of mechanical relations however subtle and complex those relations.
- - -



As a piecemeal factoid snippet, Vit K2 (mk7) is found to remove calcium from soft tissue deposits - arteries and brain included - and move it to where it belongs. So not being deficient in K2 may be a significant factor.
- - -
meta-commentary:
Synergies of effects can operate positively or negatively - and simply adding 'good' things wont in itself set a good foundation. A true foundation is where we live FROM.

if we are seeking 'health' as an evasion of fearful consequence - then we bring those fears with us in the very acts that seem positive. The call to wholeness is the call to joy and health is not an evasion or absence of symptoms - but rather a freedom from being negatively defined by conflicted self OR its symptoms. Focussing in what we don't want - as if a positive act is the nature of 'mind-capture'.

And focusing exclusively in the physically framed sense of life, deprives even our physical brain of its wholeness-as part-of a greater communication and sharing in Life. And so seem to be a brain, enclosed in a body, condemned in time to suffer and die and so understandably dissociating from such 'reality' in seeking to set a narrative over it.

In its chronic or persistent activation, fear operates 'mind-capture' by its fight/flight response. All else is suppressed by the sympathetic nervous response - but the balancing and restoring of a greater embrace works to protect even amidst such stress. Chronic fear works against this embrace or rebalancing, and blocks healing - so as to make stress a negative addiction rather than a positive catalyst to the need of a greater embrace.

In life a flexible mind can serve a relational integrity - where a rigidity breaks down and separates off. This fact has reflections in our biology.


Saturday, 20 May 2017

Chemtrails blocking the light

Below is my comment into one commentary video among many upon the geo-engineering operating for decades now, without public accountability or oversight and for reasons undisclosed.

In reply to H. Vlad - who said:
This is the way of choosing. Thru out history there was a series of
puzzles that demanded attention because of results that changed (in
worst, most cases) the perception of reality, of life as we see it. We
as participants in this all around show that we call life, are
challenged to take a stance and make a CHOICE, utterly based, in
principle, to our convictions, our desires.

Yes - that's where I feel to be with regard to perceiving an 'insane' world. Step back and feel what the real choice is - rather than be conformed in false framing. If I write now on the theme of this - it is to (your) willingness to alight in it - and not as a personal response or expectation.

Giving power to hate, fear and death, is subjection and torment of such experience. The mind cannot think outside its conditioning but from a new choice, rises a new mind. The choice to hate and fear a negative... becomes the negative operating in mask or disguise. The choice to not align in, support or give focus of energy and attention in reaction is a 'releasing the mind' in which the true movement of an Original Nature aligns a choice I cannot make alone - for the 'alone-ness' IS the mind of the choice to give power to a wish - and believe it guilty of killing true - which in a sense it does while operating as the foundation of the mind.

The 'survival' (fear and war) script becomes an awakening script. Firstly to the exposure of the insanity as insane. A choice to hate and resist evil - unrecognized as choice - locks the mind into forcing its version of 'sanity' on top of perceived chaos under the guilt of fear - and the fear of guilt's penalty. From the point of the Projection called the Fall - this is where we 'came in' or were 'entranced' and so this is where NOT justifying re-investment in hate as word, thought and deed - puts the 'mind behind'. (releases a trapped or looped attention). And opens to all things new. This cannot be put into old paradigm concept without subverting the forms of new insight to the same old deceit.

This opening or disclosure may be imagined or surmised to occur in any case with physical death - but opening a House of Many Mansions while yet in the focus of physical sense is a collective shift - in a choiceless choice - for when the nature of what SEEMS choice is starkly illuminated, no 'mind' of 'choose-between' sits on its illusory fence. But the nature of the 'mind' of 'choose-between' is to know not what it does. Or in modern terms - unconscious of the nature and habit of its choices - in a world that seems to just 'happen' and to which reaction is already preloaded to be triggered.

To love in hell is a self-contradiction - just as is 'war in Heaven'. To be the willingness of love in hell is any instant of the release of the mind of self-hatred to the simple and native desire for truth.

If God so loved his Son that He gave him the world healed and anew - then to shift to the point of recognition of such calls for an alignment in like qualities - as the choices by which we accept a true Source and Authoring rather than assert an oppositional independence that only seems power by the hidden hate of a false self seeking.

The psyop of fear is at root the call to fear in denial. It calls for allegiance in sacrifice of wholeness to a reversal f Creation - under the guise of power and protection for a fragmented and dissociated sense of self.

The idea that humans do only what is in their own interest needs also to allow their accepted self-definition frames their perceptions and reactions. Self-hate is more than capable of operating a vengeance upon all that lives under an illusion of being a power above a hated life. For it supports not our self-specialness in 'wish' no matter how forcefully or how pathetically we play that out - and so a sense of betrayal is projected by the wish that is actually embodied in the choice of a wish over true willing. Knowing not what we do.

To raise the illusion of power, one must kill the truth and keep it so. But to the belief in such power does love seem total sacrifice - because the true power of life is not felt within such belief - being already the doing of the thing it fears.

This is a morning meditation. The sun here where I write is bright and today is at hand to be lived - one way or another. The feeling of being and the recognition of love's honesty is not demanding special forms and conditions to be itself, but rather a willingness of 'not knowing' into which the prompts and inspirations of the ordinary moment - become the felt movement of a flow of being. And yes - this will encounter 'unwillingness' or 'resistance' that can frame me in reaction or be released in discernment.

Why do I have a mind that can block the light - and cast all in its own shadow? When its victory is my defeat also?
Because I give it attention and allegiance and prominence in place of a true appreciation.
How might we wake to the nature and the act of what we do - beneath the mask of the world, but by meeting our Reflection at every turn? Are we damned thereby? Or released while the cock crows dawning by the grace of noticing.

If there seems a harvest of fear, is there also not a harvest of willingness for love? - through which love's recognition wordlessly extends - unblocked and truly alive?

The archetype of sacrifice to the god of terror

Comment into:

Scientific Safety of Vaccine Safety Research


In mythic terms, the people are coerced and compelled to sacrifice their vitality (their young) to the 'god' or 'terror' upon whose appeasement our 'protection' depends.
This story - and variations of it - are a deep archetype upon which the perceived world operates.

For we are coerced and compelled by 'conditions and conditioning' to sacrifice a natural feeling wholeness of being, for a mask of protection by which to participate , adapt and survive the human experience. The terrors or trauma of conflict that the masking covers are both the fear and the hatred of the fear, that demand a sense of power over life - where life itself is feared and assigned the projection of our own conflicting intent.

The division of mind to define, predict and control is itself ruling out wholeness - and seeking to interject a censor or control upon the flow of information - or the meeting of true need.
A tyrannous mind is a tyrannized mind that knows not what it does - and justifies itself in hate and fear of its own unrecognised reflection. It accuses those who do choose not to assault and sicken children of 'killing children' while doing exactly the thing they say they hate, under the banner of righteous necessity - that brooks no chink of light for revision, discussion, investigation or debate - and so takes on the qualities of an 'evil' mandate behind a mask. This triggers a polarisation of defiance against an un-owned hate. For to pharmaceutically assault babies and children (and adults) under the guise of a theory asserted as medical fact - as if the 'science is settled' - is State or indeed corporately owned state power.

Clinging to a dying model or image of self and world-reality is calling suffering and death by wilful ignorance. The attempt to control leads to a more and more out of control 'reality-experience' of narrative framing - pumping up the pharma, military-industrial and 'intelligence' structure like a cancerous tumour - sucking all the vitality from the whole to the priesthoods of 'control'.

While 'they' have our allegiance and support - as power and protection of our sense of self in life - they USE it to lose the patient while 'killing' the disease.

Pre-emptive attack is becoming the normal. The array of 'power and protection' against what is imagined, feared or subliminally programmed to happen.

I cant engage in reasoned discussion with the intent to only adopt the FORM of communication as  weapon against it. That mind is closed by design. But where any willingness arises - let it find a willingness in me to join with.

The 'evil' is set up to be un-challengable in direct terms - for it is foundational to the way we have learned/been trained to think - in place of a qualitatively transcendent nature that has been denied a structural voice. This is the work of an active willingness for wholeness of being - health and sanity - regardless the forms it takes.

Using the form of things to mask hidden intent is what we take to be a private mind. Identifying behind a 'fig-leafed' obfuscation pays the price, while clever accounting 'outsources' and redefines so as to displace pain and loss to 'other' or not self.

No one is blinded by science - but the wish NOT to see finds a match in forms of scientism. There is nothing about ANY human endeavour that is not ruled by the same - generally unconscious - archetypes.

Love of truth cannot abandon Reason and Science - but only release the confusion of masking forms to a renewal of a love of truth and the truth of love - which has NO place in the mind of wilful conflict and confusion.

If there is a first-born to give up in favour of a true foundation - it is our private separative and unloving thoughts - by which we rule out love in a sense of limited sacrifice as the mind of 'what do I get out of this?'

Well you get a sense of disconnection under an illusion of power that draws ever more of you to forget what Connection is and defend against it to protect a false investment.

If this is 'too long' I would post a thumbnail and link to the rest. But it arose in context of relationship at this timing - in this opening of communication - and so comes to this meeting of attention in such terms as it has found.